Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nrhope@gmail.com designates
 209.85.198.228 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=F0U0hil8q9CX2SVz/OE9L9FDPOBapBqbKlFCU1lkcVmX7NrIzzJreERb4n96kh8+Fq
         CL8/2ejIRC9mNstLzQtuckUdeO5hL6+WqfV0B2nDCU9VRFPDnHYnEoS35v0jomBWE5dK
         MMKdLc03dF+PBJNCgAQm+My72X9ADXGUIakYw=
Message-ID: <f275eef10809090022r33977cc4h927f2b1849abeb5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 17:22:21 +1000
From: "Norval Hope" <nrhope@gmail.com>
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>,
	elecharny@iktek.com
Subject: Re: Failing tests (was: Re: [VOTE] Release ApacheDS 1.5.4)
In-Reply-To: <f275eef10809090008m68fee05x3b3a957848d11ad2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <a32f6b020809071558v7da36f3dv300192183c75df66@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f275eef10809071649k593e4a96x3b141726fb0123e6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f275eef10809071716t325ff436u9df894c8f5d44f3e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f275eef10809071739l3ef0fa7cqa0bb4353ec0ccc23@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a32f6b020809072119l1f0953e1yfd6d884260597ac7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <d45b08f00809072240o255ec94aub8abbc985b9e9e6d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f275eef10809082100j4bea1ce5ge3dbb2f260ec854@mail.gmail.com>
	 <48C60E7A.2030309@iktek.com>
	 <f275eef10809090008m68fee05x3b3a957848d11ad2@mail.gmail.com>

Also, one more question: is there a reason that MINA 1.1.6 is still
being used instead of 1.1.8? I have to reapply my mods for
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1161 (have noticed your
guys' updates on the issue) and was wondering if I should do this
against 1.1.6 or perhaps save some future work and apply them to 1.18
instead.

Thanks

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Norval Hope <nrhope@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok - I can imagine that covers the core-integ/ failures (at least some
> of them anyway, the "schema/" versus "system/" problem maybe looks
> like a separate issue), but does it also explain the earlier
> jdbm-store/ failures too?
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Emmanuel L=E9charny <elecharny@iktek.com>=
 wrote:
>> Norval Hope wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> I'm referring to
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/trunk-with-dependenc=
ies
>>> with no mods whatsoever (I planned to get a stable base and then
>>> submit some of the "more likely to interest you guys" patches for
>>> review). Unfortunately I "mvn clean"ed and moved my ~/.m2/repository
>>> out of the way and rebuilt and can confirm I see the same failures.
>>>
>>> Don't know enough about the new build / code to comment with much
>>> authority but it doesn't seem to me that the core-integ failures are
>>> knock-on effects from the jdbm-store failures.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>> It seems that there is an old issue on Windows, an issue we already met
>> monts (years ?) ago, when it comes to delete files on the disk. There is=
 a
>> kind of race condition. The problem was that we were trying to remove th=
e
>> test files which were still hold by some process. Alex tried to clean it=
 up
>> a while back, but it seems to be still around. Damn !
>>
>> --
>> --
>> cordialement, regards,
>> Emmanuel L=E9charny
>> www.iktek.com
>> directory.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>