Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25862 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2008 08:48:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2008 08:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 28939 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2008 08:48:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 28900 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2008 08:48:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 28889 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2008 08:48:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:48:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.176] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:47:20 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so254020pye.19 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:47:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=qQ+uTW723tnJyyvFk3OZvvGUF0Ncb/hmjfJqwqCw8WI=; b=A89eFdZMavA7FrjjBZrvlRn8i7KURRHmQmCabSDV686ZPX/Mr4Hmeh9yCsX4mXNJFy Z+oOvcrWs27tmZtXZ0qUV+/x6BWf3YQzl0Z589GJn79oTzpkoQcnAn4MlM3Qb5/quJrZ qIcKvORmPLaGV+pUyKq3luez3X7x5mQmM4Q3A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=XRN0AHABZy54O6jp0vRj7V01hqlAN3J+oC6EVuBN82HKy/K/f6qUBs4+2NiOhARq/N M6qd1guZOjWqsWg6HVrNHnCX5h7KDsgESqSwNWQPGSUswU/HcWN/N+iXuyP1fHKrGBtV 3qRNh8kWYvaH5PgeCVQitrg326wFBlK090pnQ= Received: by 10.142.238.12 with SMTP id l12mr837653wfh.204.1221122872007; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.6.6 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98d8c0860809110147u4fc39393u3298038943791e9b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:47:51 +0200 From: "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" Sender: pajbam@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [Studio] Eclipse plugin snapshot update In-Reply-To: <48C8DA53.1020002@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_39719_16352119.1221122871973" References: <48C8C898.6000905@otego.com> <48C8CD44.1090709@apache.org> <98d8c0860809110127m72f8e4f0va2b859cb42e85667@mail.gmail.com> <48C8D7DD.60406@apache.org> <98d8c0860809110139i4ff8f679le3d17ba43b20d25e@mail.gmail.com> <48C8DA53.1020002@apache.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0d54654aaed4abce X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_39719_16352119.1221122871973 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Well, I was thinking we could tell our users they need to copy/paste the content of the 'plugins' and 'features' folders of the ZIP on the corresponding folders of their Eclipse installation. That's not a very difficult task, so I think they can do it easily. Pierre-Arnaud On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Felix Knecht wrote: > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb: > > Hi Felix, > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Felix Knecht > > wrote: > > > > > > > Unfortunately, Eclipse won't be able to find an update between two > > > builds of this nightly update site (as the version number will stay > > > the same). The solution would be to uninstall Studio's features and > > > plugins before re-installing them with the update site. > > IMO this is too complex for a 'normal' user. Thus I'd vote only for > 2. > > > > > > Yeah, but I don't think a "normal" user would try to use a nightly > > version of Studio. ;) > > > > However, I think solution 2 is enough and as we already have the zip > > generated at each build. > Nope. This zip must have another directory structure to make it work. It > must look like > > eclipse > \ plugins > \ features > > Otherwise it won't work :-( > > > > We just need to deploy it aside the other already available downloads. > > > > Pierre-Arnaud > > ------=_Part_39719_16352119.1221122871973 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Well, I was thinking we could tell our users they need to copy/paste the content of the 'plugins' and 'features' folders of the ZIP on the corresponding folders of their Eclipse installation.

That's not a very difficult task, so I think they can do it easily.

Pierre-Arnaud

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Felix Knecht <felixk@apache.org> wrote:
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb:
> Hi Felix,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Felix Knecht <felixk@apache.org
> <mailto:felixk@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>
>     > Unfortunately, Eclipse won't be able to find an update between two
>     > builds of this nightly update site (as the version number will stay
>     > the same). The solution would be to uninstall Studio's features and
>     > plugins before re-installing them with the update site.
>     IMO this is too complex for a 'normal' user. Thus I'd vote only for 2.
>
>
> Yeah, but I don't think a "normal" user would try to use a nightly
> version of Studio. ;)
>
> However, I think solution 2 is enough and as we already have the zip
> generated at each build.
Nope. This zip must have another directory structure to make it work. It
must look like

eclipse
 \ plugins
 \ features

Otherwise it won't work :-(


> We just need to deploy it aside the other already available downloads.
>
> Pierre-Arnaud


------=_Part_39719_16352119.1221122871973--