Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2614 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2008 06:19:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2008 06:19:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 11665 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2008 06:18:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 11626 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2008 06:18:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 11615 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2008 06:18:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:18:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 06:18:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 2353 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2008 06:18:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Sep 2008 06:18:39 -0000 Message-ID: <48C6153E.5070601@apache.org> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:18:38 +0200 From: Stefan Seelmann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: RAT and MANIFEST.MF References: <48C4EF91.6040809@otego.com> <98d8c0860809080318j20c26b75oc474561d05705a3e@mail.gmail.com> <48C50F1B.20009@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48C50F1B.20009@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I excluded the MANIFEST.MF from the rat report. Stefan Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > The syntax for a Manisfest.mf file does not allow comments, so you can't > include a header. We already tied to inject such a header a few months > ago, but without success. > > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: >> Hi Felix, >> >> The license header is mandatory on all source file ("Source File >> Headers for >> Code Developed at the ASF") as it is mentionned in this page [1]. >> >> I don't think the manifest file can be considered as a source file. >> Generally it's more a generated file, but in some cases (studio's case >> mainly) we need to store them in SVN. >> >> So I think (and it's only my personal POV), the license header is not >> useful >> in this kind of files. >> >> What do others think ? >> >> Regards, >> Pierre-Arnaud >> >> [1] - http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Felix Knecht wrote: >> >> > Hi all > > I'm not sure, but do manifest.mf files really do need to have a license > header? If not we should exculde the manifest > files in the TLP pom from RAT. > > Felix >>> >> >>