directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Knecht <fel...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [studio] tagBase
Date Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:01:02 GMT
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Maybe this is because our current release process is done by hand, by
> me and I have absolutely no idea what are the prerequisites of the scm
> section of the pom.
>
> I'd love to see the whole release process completely automated, but I
> don't know if we can use the release plugin to release Studio because
> of the Eclipse weird things we need to do...
I think it should be possible as we can also create the nightly dists by
maven. Where do you see the problems caused by Eclipse?

Felix
>
> WDYT ?
>
> P-A
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Felix Knecht <felixk@apache.org
> <mailto:felixk@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>     Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb:
>     > +1 too, of course.
>     >
>     > Let's unify this between projects.
>     >
>     > I think we can simply drop the current 'tags' folder and then move
>     'releases' to 'tags'.
>
>     I think so too.
>
>     But there's another problem we need to solve for the next release.
>     Look
>     at the <scm> section of the to poms [1][2]
>     [2] is the one I was keen to release. It contains the tagged URL
>     whereas
>     [1] contains the trunk as URL. Maybe this is an issue of the release
>     process of studio?
>
>     Regards
>     Felix
>
>     [1]
>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/releases/1.2.0/pom.xml
>     [2]
>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/tags/1.0.0/pom.xml
>
>
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Pierre-Arnaud
>     >
>     > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
>     <elecharny@gmail.com <mailto:elecharny@gmail.com>
>     <mailto:elecharny@gmail.com <mailto:elecharny@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     So far, we don't have a 'release' element?. All we have is
>     'branches', 'tags', and 'trunk' (+ trunk-with-dependencies...)
>     >
>     >     It would be good to stick to this convention.
>     >     So +1 to move to 'tags' instead of 'relase' for studio.
>     >
>     >
>     >     Felix Knecht wrote:
>     >
>     > Before doing wrong I think to remember we decided to have no
>     longer a
>     > releases tree beside the trunk/tags/branches but
>     > putting release tags to tags tree. For studio this is not yet
>     the case
>     > (see diff needed to patch).
>     >
>     > Index: pom.xml
>     > ===================================================================
>     > --- pom.xml     (revision 696222)
>     > +++ pom.xml     (working copy)
>     > @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@
>     >         <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
>     >         <artifactId>maven-release-plugin</artifactId>
>     >         <configuration>
>     > -
>     >
>     <tagBase>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/releases/</tagBase>
>     > +
>     >
>     <tagBase>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/tags/</tagBase>
>     >         </configuration>
>     >       </plugin>
>     >       <plugin>
>     >
>     > Regards
>     > Felix
>     >
>     > PS:
>     > At least this saves me from the studio/sutdio-plugin tagging problem
>     > ATM ;-)
>
>     >     --
>     >     --
>     >     cordialement, regards,
>     >     Emmanuel L├ęcharny
>     >     www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com> <http://www.iktek.com>
>     >     directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org>
>     <http://directory.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message