Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95244 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2008 14:50:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Aug 2008 14:50:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 45718 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2008 14:50:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 45676 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2008 14:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 45665 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2008 14:50:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:50:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.170.189] (HELO rn-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.170.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:49:56 +0000 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m7so392564rnd.3 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:50:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=VyqjWGhUrddeMNQ3EqH/0K5UEQos0RIJF3jEgom2B3M=; b=fnMopEJnOUFF1FOND6MTd/6bCHxdDQcBA4pX6RztEGD2qJ7lik+C278QQAz0/dEjuq tJMH/2R6Fl9J7R4mxn592pCikMwLFb48l4y3TrEpbrEBy0gKkKyeZnrYMqJ9utkSFYwV S5I6ApzbB7QVv4jGmgx/oGMHRv3jLw3dwqGQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mWXqOBfg7aJMgm9QiZRjALd+ojUDJaIUeez8iRUjLiZakUxp3eHTZcStVLcg7JmZKD E6lPh6txK9/EthDducwJG9aFK7DzQHcQIRXWkTi2Yh8+bukDxyEOlqyC+wpxpzffbJwe Pswe6Q1HAq3YEc+DyTe2v5zaTGz+V1+YaM6AE= Received: by 10.114.24.5 with SMTP id 5mr6637705wax.160.1219157424399; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.66.3 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:24 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" , elecharny@nextury.com Subject: Re: Renaming newldap to ldap In-Reply-To: <48AAC148.50103@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7170_5182598.1219157424410" References: <48AAC148.50103@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e1c4a42521647ef7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_7170_5182598.1219157424410 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Yeah sorry that's a good idea. If you get to it before me just remember to make sure the server.xml file in server-xml module is also massaged to hold the correct class referrences for handlers. Alex On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wro= te: > Hi guys; > > when Alex did the refactoring of the Ldap handlers, he renamed them to > newXXX. Is there any objection to a renaming back to the initial name (ld= ap > instead of newldap) ? > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel L=E9charny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > > --=20 Microsoft gives you Windows, Linux gives you the whole house ... ------=_Part_7170_5182598.1219157424410 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Yeah sorry that's a good idea.  If you get to it = before me just remember to make sure the server.xml file in server-xml modu= le is also massaged to hold the correct class referrences for handlers.&nbs= p;

Alex

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Emm= anuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys;

when Alex did the refactoring of the Ldap handlers, he renamed them to newX= XX. Is there any objection to a renaming back to the initial name (ldap ins= tead of newldap) ?

--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L=E9charny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.= org





--
Microsoft gives = you Windows, Linux gives you the whole house ...
------=_Part_7170_5182598.1219157424410--