Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19906 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2008 12:49:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Aug 2008 12:49:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 23955 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2008 12:49:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 23767 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2008 12:49:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 23756 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2008 12:49:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:49:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.31] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:48:47 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so316430ywe.55 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:49:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WEJPmku9GOe37IadHpOUeYjHE7K8AC1RRQ+6tskSYl4=; b=GxpcGDubhn6BAEILbmgMbVHW4SSQoYRb9hcAV5rO0zjzVoKSeicd9Am6VBEa4ow47d CAvCP4F0p1kZ2Ysn4I76j+UU8377FcRJN8D2Xd6TvGDHBrzB++2Jw8pQ+JOGu+4tW5a0 NEVCTXxsn+M8W+hbZXpz5kZPbv6USCuSM9aK8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dvq8kJy8c7/2gqy/st2+uaZ8+QHp7GipHRpWbxipI3RCgWAYZMiakEpuaYb6eEkRZV wDd38CAjGICkVP+o3fwASLz5a/rDk/TjDIlhy6fk1DjQLYrQ7Rwfpztnot4biNb41ZkF 0a9jyfLl0ctKeEf17nhPXJhF5z0kYRArm3YBI= Received: by 10.103.11.5 with SMTP id o5mr4782916mui.85.1219150154101; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?62.147.183.209? ( [62.147.183.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm91340muh.12.2008.08.19.05.49.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48AAC148.50103@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:49:12 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny Reply-To: elecharny@nextury.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Renaming newldap to ldap Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guys; when Alex did the refactoring of the Ldap handlers, he renamed them to newXXX. Is there any objection to a renaming back to the initial name (ldap instead of newldap) ? -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel L�charny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org