directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kiran Ayyagari (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DIRSERVER-1094) ChangeLog interfaces must be able to capture enough information to restore state of operational attributes
Date Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:50:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12624280#action_12624280
] 

Kiran Ayyagari commented on DIRSERVER-1094:
-------------------------------------------

IMO it makes sense to have the user who performed the revert operation in the modifiersName
rather than restoring the attribute's old value. This way am thinking that we can *actually*
know who performed the revert operation.

wdyt?

> ChangeLog interfaces must be able to capture enough information to restore state of operational
attributes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-1094
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1094
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Alex Karasulu
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> The change log interfaces may need to capture more information to properly restore the
state of operational attributes after applying reverse LDIF's.  This operational attribute
information cannot be stored in band with the LDIF since LDIFs cannot have all operational
attributes in them since most must be managed directly by the server.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message