Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46787 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2008 00:13:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2008 00:13:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 70899 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2008 00:13:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 70852 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2008 00:13:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 70841 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2008 00:13:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:13:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.31] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:12:58 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so2352829ywe.55 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:13:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=qGyU8Kiq1dfjLBEiodJzgH7psOwVQteJVMdNArs6vJc=; b=eZMo3vU6Wyts//8l6ZJm4Z+r3Qbp0q9AlR8ZwIb/b+gq7OmyJ0edJMy5tJPMEs9Ap2 Zu57Lpc5QNIrPwDhFj9rAKVoWN+drm4pp/Iht32Uf9b9O7339tkYN9B198R2x2luPn5G 7RZxClNBJLdgQd6TzfRny0BQQZjycXhbtPUKg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=B2hpg4wgG9H3hRjb5s5vRfQc6x/72MCxT3H5/f1/cKZVT/upUP6NTRpoWNiB83GZep Jx0JctJ1mi9gmM6JwBLqXLJPDyKh4GSi/cnkRKiOPru+vF7K5ulX397nc3pUf3dD6cZA zJqtXWOrk4+7nRYw8MEmsURk2XV3YQz2YsFfw= Received: by 10.150.149.19 with SMTP id w19mr19363183ybd.19.1215994396942; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.113.15 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:13:16 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [Project] Project pom release 11 is same as 10 In-Reply-To: <487A9499.8070500@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_69156_29363166.1215994396958" References: <487A9499.8070500@apache.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 96e378acb8e0755c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_69156_29363166.1215994396958 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Felix, On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Felix Knecht wrote: > Alex Karasulu schrieb: > >> Hi all, >> >> Just a note to the community. As I was releasing ApacheDS 1.5.3 I noticed >> that we were still set to version 10 of the TLP pom. The latest version >> that I just released is 11. Both are poms are identical besides the >> versions and URLs into svn where the tags can be found. >> > > It's quite a time ago I had the last time a 'silly' question, but > > Why do we need to release then a new version of the pom? Maybe I missed > something but IMO if nothing has changed we should still be able to use pom > version 10, don't we? > > You're right we did not need to release 11 at all. I accidentally released it because when I looked at the project/trunk/pom.xml it was at 11-SNAPSHOT. I presumed shared, apacheds, daemon and installers trunks used this 11-SNAPSHOT. I also presumed that it was bumped up to 11-SNAPSHOT because changes were induced to 10. Next time I will check to make sure there are no differences before releasing. This pom should not be bumped on each release iteration to the next SNAPSHOT. Part of the problem is Maven's release plugin which does this automatically. Regards, Alex -- Microsoft gives you Windows, Linux gives you the whole house ... ------=_Part_69156_29363166.1215994396958 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Felix,

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Felix Knecht <felixk@apache.org> wrote:
Alex Karasulu schrieb:

Hi all,

Just a note to the community.  As I was releasing ApacheDS 1.5.3 I noticed that we were still set to version 10 of the TLP pom.  The latest version that I just released is 11.  Both are poms are identical besides the versions and URLs into svn where the tags can be found.

It's quite a time ago I had the last time a 'silly' question, but

Why do we need to release then a new version of the pom? Maybe I missed something but IMO if nothing has changed we should still be able to use pom version 10, don't we?


You're right we did not need to release 11 at all.  I accidentally released it because when I looked at the project/trunk/pom.xml it was at 11-SNAPSHOT.  I presumed shared, apacheds, daemon and installers trunks used this 11-SNAPSHOT.  I also presumed that it was bumped up to 11-SNAPSHOT because changes were induced to 10.

Next time I will check to make sure there are no differences before releasing.  This pom should not be bumped on each release iteration to the next SNAPSHOT.  Part of the problem is Maven's release plugin which does this automatically.

Regards,
Alex

--
Microsoft gives you Windows, Linux gives you the whole house ... ------=_Part_69156_29363166.1215994396958--