directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Installers] Some thoughts regarding better organization for installers
Date Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:42:19 GMT
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>   
>> Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Was just looking at the installers project during release and I got some
>>> ideas.
>>>
>>> (1) Perhaps we should break apart this big apacheds module under it into
>>> separate installers for:
>>>      o server-installer (apacheds module)
>>>      o studio-installer (studio module)
>>>      o suite-installer (suite module)
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Perhaps we should simply remove the last two installers, and keep only the
>> ADS installer.
>>     
>
>
> Why remove them (especially the studio one)?  These installers are not in
> the ApacheDS top project.  The installers project is standalone for managing
> all our installers.
>   
Because Studio already has all the needed installers ?
>
>   
>>  (2) Fix suite installer so it no longer needs to pull installer from a
>>     
>>> website? Is this even worth doing?
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> I think we can doom the suite installer. It does not make a lot of sense
>> anyway, now that we have ADS embedded into Studio.
>>
>>     
>
> I like the suite installer because it allows for an ApacheDS formal
> installation in addition to having it available to start via Studio.  But
> you might be right about this.  Wonder what others thinking as well.
>   
Yeah, me too. Guys ?


Mime
View raw message