Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19954 invoked from network); 9 May 2008 21:14:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2008 21:14:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 45666 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2008 21:14:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 45617 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2008 21:14:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 45606 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2008 21:14:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 May 2008 14:14:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.157] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 May 2008 21:14:03 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1412390fgg.3 for ; Fri, 09 May 2008 14:14:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=KbALWR1kyiu1iaU/QCfewQnIcuqVR9y2Dm2euZtzlFE=; b=itBQeJmjPtAqQnoJrhsTScuYfCY8peenip1FMJvCQlSkkjUXx6euU/amkVPPgLGxXEBwvspE76DeoPxIvUoB67UIiDIG+RnHY9lVLbFPiD38wCFmGbIJVWu0ri4NknnVbQtJeMRH1MDI7amwJ2ETzWPiqD6xRil5WgioQTFd81A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=EkDtXamFCfCiSqfyI2iDVOf505jyDIHwguptqKRVR24fbu/60CjEScPQOwr6qM6d20rxSUkLQY89yWiNJwRPq/Jg8UYa/aQX3EBqRa1k/qUxXz8HZXyVGArAUq0HACvImNvPQ/Fb4JtLXphlkQigqShyLGIuMgMoKqjmzOTrFRw= Received: by 10.86.100.19 with SMTP id x19mr9348393fgb.12.1210367665296; Fri, 09 May 2008 14:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [82.66.216.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm4679301fga.7.2008.05.09.14.14.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 09 May 2008 14:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4824BEAE.20904@apache.org> Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 23:14:22 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [ApacheDS][SASL] Where did this SIMPLE mechanism come from? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: Emmanuel Lecharny X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alex Karasulu wrote: > Hey guys, > > Someone brought it to my attention that we have a 'SIMPLE' SASL > mechanism. Furthermore it is being used to enable and disable simple > binds. Just curious who rigged it up that way and why? > > Was the SIMPLE mechanism intended to be "PLAIN" sasl auth? > > Thanks, > Alex After having checked the code, it's really dubious. We have to fix it. -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel L�charny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org