Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77446 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2008 12:24:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2008 12:24:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 48458 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2008 12:24:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48246 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2008 12:24:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48235 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2008 12:24:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:24:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.227] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:23:55 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so824272rvb.25 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:24:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=bPm2SDGR4ymqhbdUOMO8N1pleugDNgMM0tmapgY2Zt8=; b=QGKDTtAZ/Anh/Q/l7+Fic8WNhyRLCKdB0DBmFM4Qzm3kSLVTnCS8l9dVCQxCFo/5RjIgJBNlQHbJLkZ+LvgkGoXCCuCIiQEAanjTteb64Ftnm5aGzuDIWWRwAXH0R+3Of+2A2z/K2sVqSD0utJV7aJPuiiEF5lP0QUqE6mPnSGI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=qlS5KslHPZi25fTbNxxCGR8G0pFaQS8+BHpmSGR5u6fENS+T2JZ7oR2ZPI8aR1N7uiqP6OAw/Ct9BB3lufTZqsblVsfvWgtE3UWmViiooCKxETEu/pSClF1SE17OVioJvZC1gqXQCjX+DBYo9SkHN6OX7zZ2bV4fpWSz4dIt8HA= Received: by 10.140.148.3 with SMTP id v3mr4259901rvd.71.1208262247687; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.113.13 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:24:07 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: Installer problem with attempt to delete opt directory In-Reply-To: <4803DA5F.2040108@fladi.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1005_26033055.1208262247689" References: <98d8c0860804141143u66bae23erbb27d93dd194cbcc@mail.gmail.com> <98d8c0860804141240v1460ec9rcef65082fb8d0044@mail.gmail.com> <4803C895.5020303@fladi.at> <4803DA5F.2040108@fladi.at> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8fe77d4621841b1a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_1005_26033055.1208262247689 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I've now seen this behavior as you stated in action. You're dead on target. It will keep going up the file system directory hierarchy until it deletes all ancestors of the installation unless there is another package that is also installed under an ancestor. Odd that this is not directly stated somewhere since it can spook people out like it did me. Alex On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Michael Fladischer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Alex, > > I'm still looking for an official comment from the dpkg developers > regarding this behavior but haven't found one yet. It's not mentioned in > the man pages and neither in the package maintainer guide. > So far I can only tell you what I have found out while creating various > packages for Debian. I'll let you know if I come across some online > reference ... > > Reards, > Michael > > Alex Karasulu wrote: > > Oh that's great. I guess you're quoting some source online? > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFIA9pfhuoBH16pp9gRAj6lAKCT5+rQwBuX/HTwvRKlRqnf32xvWwCfZnXD > aOsNGXU/4VaRCgAe5IWcpMw= > =UyjW > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > ------=_Part_1005_26033055.1208262247689 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I've now seen this behavior as you stated in action.  You're dead on target.  It will keep going up the file system directory hierarchy until it deletes all ancestors of the installation unless there is another package that is also installed under an ancestor.

Odd that this is not directly stated somewhere since it can spook people out like it did me.

Alex

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Alex,

I'm still looking for an official comment from the dpkg developers
regarding this behavior but haven't found one yet. It's not mentioned in
the man pages and neither in the package maintainer guide.
So far I can only tell you what I have found out while creating various
packages for Debian. I'll let you know if I come across some online
reference ...

Reards,
Michael

Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Oh that's great.  I guess you're quoting some source online?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIA9pfhuoBH16pp9gRAj6lAKCT5+rQwBuX/HTwvRKlRqnf32xvWwCfZnXD
aOsNGXU/4VaRCgAe5IWcpMw=
=UyjW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------=_Part_1005_26033055.1208262247689--