Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.233 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=tUrF9r5sGts0B8o3RHpJxB9wOJcE4+uKjnHsOv+q1AHhbOfdso85XgpNrTBIW4TlHlHLo7miAKQq9ZeWzrsIOr5LcwQyfo3M/02GfafHN3ib8G/X6lDDr6VSFH1EgWirCjFJj7Bp8kiqtG6TZ3r9FuKXGtejIH9kFv8AG5mEdSI=
Message-ID: <a32f6b020804050854y27340546sc0ba47ff5fe8c56a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:54:19 -0400
From: "Alex Karasulu" <akarasulu@apache.org>
Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [ApacheDS] 1.5.2 release VSLDAP run
In-Reply-To: <47F76DE0.6010508@labeo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_9230_31694778.1207410859460"
References: <a32f6b020804021611i36e8ef16y58fb4300ac17bed6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47F76DE0.6010508@labeo.de>

------=_Part_9230_31694778.1207410859460
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks Stefan.  At AC we can discuss the new SSL certificate setup in
ApacheDS.

Alex

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Stefan Zoerner <stefan@labeo.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have conducted a VSLDAP BASE run against the 1.5.2 snapshot provided
> here
> http://people.apache.org/~akarasulu/apacheds/candidates/1.5.2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eakarasulu/apacheds/candidates/1.5.2/>
> results can be found here
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxPMGT/20080405_1.5.2
>
> 5 tests don't pass, but this is not a blocker from my point of view:
>
> 2 failures are due to the missing SSL configuration in the test runner (as
> Alex had expected, see below). I need some support to configure a
> appropriate server certificate (VSLDAP is not easy to please here).
>
> The other 3 failures are related to an accepted test suite deficiency.
> http://tracking.opengroup.org/openbrand/publicpr/PRView?PR=2536
> I have not updated to the latest version of VSLDAP. I will do later and
> check whether the new version from February has fixed this issue.
>
> Greetings from Hamburg,
>    Stefan Z
>
>
>
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> > Can you do a VSLDAP run for us to make sure the current bigbang version
> > is going to pass?  Thanks we're about to kick off the vote here in 24hrs so
> > this would be good to have now.  BTW you might run into a problem or two
> > with the new handling of certificates - I can help you get setup with that.
> >  We're storing the cert now in the DIT.
> >
>
>

------=_Part_9230_31694778.1207410859460
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks Stefan.&nbsp; At AC we can discuss the new SSL certificate setup in ApacheDS.<br><br>Alex<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Stefan Zoerner &lt;<a href="mailto:stefan@labeo.de">stefan@labeo.de</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi all,<br>
<br>
I have conducted a VSLDAP BASE run against the 1.5.2 snapshot provided here<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
<a href="http://people.apache.org/%7Eakarasulu/apacheds/candidates/1.5.2/" target="_blank">http://people.apache.org/~akarasulu/apacheds/candidates/1.5.2/</a><br></div>
results can be found here<br>
<a href="http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxPMGT/20080405_1.5.2" target="_blank">http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxPMGT/20080405_1.5.2</a><br>
<br>
5 tests don&#39;t pass, but this is not a blocker from my point of view:<br>
<br>
2 failures are due to the missing SSL configuration in the test runner (as Alex had expected, see below). I need some support to configure a appropriate server certificate (VSLDAP is not easy to please here).<br>
<br>
The other 3 failures are related to an accepted test suite deficiency.<br>
<a href="http://tracking.opengroup.org/openbrand/publicpr/PRView?PR=2536" target="_blank">http://tracking.opengroup.org/openbrand/publicpr/PRView?PR=2536</a><br>
I have not updated to the latest version of VSLDAP. I will do later and check whether the new version from February has fixed this issue.<br>
<br>
Greetings from Hamburg,<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp;Stefan Z<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
<br>
Alex Karasulu wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Can you do a VSLDAP run for us to make sure the current bigbang version is going to pass? &nbsp;Thanks we&#39;re about to kick off the vote here in 24hrs so this would be good to have now. &nbsp;BTW you might run into a problem or two with the new handling of certificates - I can help you get setup with that. &nbsp;We&#39;re storing the cert now in the DIT.<br>

</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_9230_31694778.1207410859460--