Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38651 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2008 08:37:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2008 08:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 48880 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2008 08:37:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48820 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2008 08:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48809 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2008 08:37:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:37:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.162] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.162) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:36:51 +0000 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: kR2YrGeU3i5GJZNxbYfAbITnBeX/YWiFZ/RSZNN7D9RkvGeL2HlWCxdlFg== Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p548FC27F.dip.t-dialin.net [84.143.194.127]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo33) (RZmta 16.8) with ESMTP id c03f91k284iX1j for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:36:58 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Message-ID: <47D25073.5010803@labeo.de> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:38:11 +0100 From: Stefan Zoerner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: Why I think Spring + xbean is wrong ... References: <47CF20E5.2070602@gmail.com> <47D02430.7050500@labeo.de> <47D11899.8080509@gmail.com> <47D1F130.70306@gmail.com> <47D24B85.3010400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47D24B85.3010400@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Do we need a container technology ? The 0.8 version was working without > this IoC crap. IoC is, IMHO, hyper over hyped... But this is another > debate ! I think a container should not be necessary, if ApacheDS is embedded. In this case, every additional dependency will add burden to those who plan to integrate it in their applications. I thought this was basically the idea of using the Spring Framework. Greetings, Stefan