directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: Legal files goo
Date Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:22:46 GMT

On Mar 21, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:

> David Jencks wrote:
>> Shared notes..
>> asn1 claims to have bouncy castle code in it.  There are some  
>> files without apache license headers but I don't see any  
>> indication on any of the files I looked at that they might have  
>> come from bouncy castle.  I think all the files need apache  
>> headers.  I'd be happier if the bc files had some indication of  
>> that even though the bc originals don't.
> asn1 contains copy of BC code. All the DER classes are BC based.  
> This is why we have this claim.

I'm not sure what I was looking at previously, I thought some of the  
files had no license header whatsoever.  I can't find these any  
more.  Now it looks to me as if all the der files have the BC license  
at the top.

I think we should consider adding the apache header in addition.

david jencks

> -- 
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny

View raw message