Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34380 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2008 05:33:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2008 05:33:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 63595 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 05:33:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 63531 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2008 05:33:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 63520 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2008 05:33:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:33:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.179.121.48] (HELO viefep28-int.chello.at) (62.179.121.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:33:21 +0000 Received: from felixknecht.ch ([84.72.24.104]) by viefep28-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20080206053312.CBRL2308.viefep28-int.chello.at@felixknecht.ch> for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:33:12 +0100 Received: (qmail 9539 invoked by uid 210); 6 Feb 2008 05:33:11 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.97 by odin (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-2.02st (clamdscan: 0.92/5700. perlscan: 2.02st. Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.97):. Processed in 0.027984 secs); 06 Feb 2008 05:33:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.97?) (192.168.1.97) by 192.168.1.11 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2008 05:33:11 -0000 Message-ID: <47A94697.1070202@apache.org> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:33:11 +0100 From: Felix Knecht Organization: apache.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [Studio] Mavenization status - Remaning issues References: <98d8c0860801160525o585810ccg31d504cc621d8d37@mail.gmail.com> <47A2EFA7.6080700@apache.org> <98d8c0860802010218w73c2cb3ch6f6638d7face494d@mail.gmail.com> <47A2F42C.2020906@apache.org> <98d8c0860802010238j4c1e62feg9cebd4656a3a6c7e@mail.gmail.com> <47A35E78.1020007@gmail.com> <98d8c0860802040023i6c1b7b3bv3685436d87007e02@mail.gmail.com> <47A6FE22.7060904@gmail.com> <98d8c0860802050256t5f61deaeh153cc04d662133b3@mail.gmail.com> <98d8c0860802050633l7b024616xddc114bbd1153396@mail.gmail.com> <98d8c0860802050912m29d6f022pc68fcbad080a484c@mail.gmail.com> <47A8B30E.3050505@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> >>> *� Parent Pom* >>> We currently depend on the 9-SNAPSHOT version of the Directory >>> project pom. >>> This situation forces us to checkout and build Apache DS first, >>> before building Apache Directory Studio. >>> It takes a lot of time... :( >>> I would suggest we use the 8 version of the Directory project pom, >>> the last published version available. >>> WDYT ?* >> >> When I started with the maven build for the studio I said to myself >> "Just take the latest existing dependencies and see if I can get it >> work." From my POV there are objections taking the '8' pom if it fits >> the needs. It was too late yesterday. I just forget the no? Of course I meant ' ... there are no objections ... '? >> > You definitely don't want to use a snapshot here... the idea was to > publish a new version of the project pom whenever a change was needed. > However, you can check out just the parent and build it... that's just 1 > project, about 2 seconds. Also remember about mvn -N which does not > build any subprojects/children. >