From dev-return-23562-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Fri Feb 01 21:09:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71173 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2008 21:09:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2008 21:09:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 19995 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2008 21:09:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 19964 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2008 21:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 19944 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2008 21:09:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:09:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.178] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:08:44 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so864547waf.5 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:08:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=L/esNzR8J+85QhgpBTMPRDjXYJieYHDVkKqG+gigbWk=; b=stwm8owtAtTc1uRZ76fUQ0pbuOl2N17TaO2Y2HMxKMXX4l0XX9zVBJ2ykGE8sMcShgZTDlxmxU41QFI6v34m+B0sCJszM30qnv25guRMs2N4yNxZu8DPpoDJMG0DAXne2FZXVn9eob9OcgzBYtUvDtNDJq1DcSuvl94WFpOL06E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=rH6gWwfWvnmAE63p2V62TltYu+yTks9pbdx4nquBaIT4vp2j5t0cnLVuj9r4GgC8LZ3FjlPB1cvmkIm/JfA/H0qYp7eQ6gXPPIwyGXrVcPAWudBaNOi2UPKaiGkM0QinOIKc9YrxTYwnvTQDyd6JIZb8ybxJsrfXu0osVMMSw+A= Received: by 10.114.190.6 with SMTP id n6mr4536559waf.51.1201900130907; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:08:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.77.4 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:08:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:08:50 -0500 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: Should we rename the ldif Entry class ? In-Reply-To: <47A372EE.4080106@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_34469_8678249.1201900130909" References: <47A203A2.6090808@gmail.com> <47A372EE.4080106@apache.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 784ac1ad0e4f45bd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_34469_8678249.1201900130909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1 On Feb 1, 2008 2:28 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > +1, feel free to rename it. > > I also checked that we don't use this class in Studio atm. > > > Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb: > > Hi, > > > > I'm just wondering if it would not be a good idea to rename the > > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.Entry class to > > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.LdifEntry ? > > > > This is a littler bit embarrassing to have so many classes named Entry ! > > > > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.Entry > > org.apache.directory.server.core.interceptor.InterceptorChain$Entry > > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.aci.ProtectedItem$Entry > > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.entry.Entry > > > > I personaly don't like the interceptor Entry name (Item or Element fits > > me better) > > > > Wdyt ? > > > > ------=_Part_34469_8678249.1201900130909 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1

On Feb 1, 2008 2:28 PM, Stefan Seelmann <seelmann@apache.org> wrote:
+1, feel free to rename it.

I also checked that we don't use this class in Studio atm.


Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering if it would not be a good idea to rename the
> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.Entry class to
> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.LdifEntry ?
>
> This is a littler bit embarrassing to have so many classes named Entry !
>
> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.Entry
> org.apache.directory.server.core.interceptor.InterceptorChain$Entry
> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.aci.ProtectedItem$Entry
> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.entry.Entry<T>
>
> I personaly don't like the interceptor Entry name (Item or Element fits
> me better)
>
> Wdyt ?
>


------=_Part_34469_8678249.1201900130909--