From dev-return-23561-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Fri Feb 01 19:28:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27844 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2008 19:28:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2008 19:28:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 20089 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2008 19:28:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 20016 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2008 19:28:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 20005 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2008 19:28:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:28:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:27:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 27698 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2008 19:27:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2008 19:27:46 -0000 Message-ID: <47A372EE.4080106@apache.org> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:28:46 +0100 From: Stefan Seelmann User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: Should we rename the ldif Entry class ? References: <47A203A2.6090808@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47A203A2.6090808@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1, feel free to rename it. I also checked that we don't use this class in Studio atm. Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb: > Hi, > > I'm just wondering if it would not be a good idea to rename the > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.Entry class to > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.LdifEntry ? > > This is a littler bit embarrassing to have so many classes named Entry ! > > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.Entry > org.apache.directory.server.core.interceptor.InterceptorChain$Entry > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.aci.ProtectedItem$Entry > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.entry.Entry > > I personaly don't like the interceptor Entry name (Item or Element fits > me better) > > Wdyt ? >