directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Should we rename the ldif Entry class ?
Date Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:08:50 GMT
+1

On Feb 1, 2008 2:28 PM, Stefan Seelmann <seelmann@apache.org> wrote:

> +1, feel free to rename it.
>
> I also checked that we don't use this class in Studio atm.
>
>
> Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm just wondering if it would not be a good idea to rename the
> > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.Entry class to
> > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.LdifEntry ?
> >
> > This is a littler bit embarrassing to have so many classes named Entry !
> >
> > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.ldif.Entry
> > org.apache.directory.server.core.interceptor.InterceptorChain$Entry
> > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.aci.ProtectedItem$Entry
> > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.entry.Entry<T>
> >
> > I personaly don't like the interceptor Entry name (Item or Element fits
> > me better)
> >
> > Wdyt ?
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message