Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates
 72.14.202.180 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=E1cAQ8MpKJTFPhJ3eRf7cRIlYCmZK5qCLEVamFNN0hH5mUy1N46YhsOzLwUx26MZApiWJENklIzn5cYo7FmpwgA1tgzZWDvTnlnSuSDYyUCke4OBUUuB+Z0uhrJg2jpZpn373t62ffrAxIhRX/BpbkmHMPjea4gItSgMt+K4drI=
Message-ID: <98d8c0860801180645q37398934w408bca664fb527c0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:45:32 +0100
From: "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" <pa@marcelot.net>
Sender: pajbam@gmail.com
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [STUDIO] Next version
In-Reply-To: <4790B4B7.1050302@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_2524_24836801.1200667532975"
References: <4790B4B7.1050302@gmail.com>

------=_Part_2524_24836801.1200667532975
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

I'm not really against this idea... Even though it will delay the release o=
f
the real 1.1, it will probably prevent us from having to release a 1.1.1 a
few days after the 1.1 release.

+1, Let's release this beast as soon as possible then... :)

Pierre-Arnaud

On Jan 18, 2008 3:16 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I'm just wondering if it would not be a good idea to release a RC for
> the release to come ? It will help to find small bugs we can have, as
> it's a GUI and as so, not easy to test.
>
> I'm afraid that we may have some regressions, and having to deliver a
> 1.1.1 a few days later can be a little bit counter-productive, when a RC
> with failure is acceptable.
>
> wdyt ?
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel L=E9charny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>

------=_Part_2524_24836801.1200667532975
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,<br><br>I&#39;m not really against this idea... Even though it will dela=
y the release of the real 1.1, it will probably prevent us from having to r=
elease a 1.1.1 a few days after the 1.1 release.<br><br>+1, Let&#39;s relea=
se this beast as soon as possible then... :)
<br><br>Pierre-Arnaud<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jan 18, 2008 3:1=
6 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:elecharny@gmail.com">elecharn=
y@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"bo=
rder-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding=
-left: 1ex;">
Hi guys,<br><br>I&#39;m just wondering if it would not be a good idea to re=
lease a RC for<br>the release to come ? It will help to find small bugs we =
can have, as<br>it&#39;s a GUI and as so, not easy to test.<br><br>I&#39;m =
afraid that we may have some regressions, and having to deliver a
<br>1.1.1 a few days later can be a little bit counter-productive, when a R=
C<br>with failure is acceptable.<br><br>wdyt ?<br><br>--<br><font color=3D"=
#888888">--<br>cordialement, regards,<br>Emmanuel L=E9charny<br><a href=3D"=
http://www.iktek.com" target=3D"_blank">
www.iktek.com</a><br><a href=3D"http://directory.apache.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">directory.apache.org</a><br><br><br></font></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_2524_24836801.1200667532975--