Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-23434-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 36841 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2008 16:07:00 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2008 16:07:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 74373 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2008 16:06:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74331 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2008 16:06:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@directory.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@directory.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@directory.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.directory.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74320 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2008 16:06:50 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:06:50 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.134.187 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.134.187] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.187)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:06:22 +0000
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so161181mue.2
        for <dev@directory.apache.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:06:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=KuiVK8awP6+gTHf1LkPxg94fey1UGmLviwuQupY1Z08=;
        b=vCzB2DtyGXU8KtFtwS/naAz9EqrlXtN7K9UX3/UWlCVs1SpDMhrieKrrasyfHCpkgv8j5ap1jdvpn8SNr530KRBYZjOoNthUz5MxS05Yw03bvqG/pDFg/kfFmCwC/OcnrqIuFsXo2fpNwT0MOCFMi30xOttwOsaFdATAr0sUr/g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=izJrtXkdznY32ZjKn4OYxdICUwlhFIwdXk+dmBKkM2JspfW6pMJbv7ae2yMbegkbJIZzNF1rIohhjN01POOJzykae/aJCeJ1CWyiKk1zC24GQHxddsNdL5QrBdk0eVT/FKaSWNFyfv/P/U3WxQy5I7XlTtlBj8QOxrWmFLx8qT4=
Received: by 10.82.159.15 with SMTP id h15mr1481933bue.36.1201190787554;
        Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:06:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.5? ( [82.245.116.110])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f19sm1861999fka.18.2008.01.24.08.06.25
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4798B753.5020200@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:05:39 +0100
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Searching takes unrealistic time.
References: 
 <C5D7630B5ADB7744ADFEBC167BC04A431A1D8C@lonsbs-onrel01.OnRelay.local>
In-Reply-To: 
 <C5D7630B5ADB7744ADFEBC167BC04A431A1D8C@lonsbs-onrel01.OnRelay.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Siva Kumar wrote:
>         <bean
> class="org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.MutableInde
> xConfiguration">
>           <property name="attributeId" value="uid" />
>           <property name="cacheSize" value="100" />
>   
Considering you are using the uid attribute, with 40 000 entries in your 
base, the current cacheSize will hold 0,25% of the existing uid. That 
means you are roughly doing a disk access each time you search for an entry.

Increase the cacheSize for each attribute your filters are using. Here, 
40 000 will be ok.

Be aware that you may have to increase the JVM memory size to avoid OOM 
exception too...

Hope it helps

-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L�charny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org