Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com
 designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=MiYFpVp1GLuelZ4FPYiNXJlSIsmiLeWjcvqBzLRiT63/G/U8Qv2SysHChUF0zLv9QzhDBSbohxsc6Wc1cGacLV2Hb4a96Q0vvBUjx0RjvP69koDWX6ObWpsCzuFKhOroPyE1p8H8sc+Zpw9jiV+mJ+5FtdmGM9zqb8KGRAzY+98=
Message-ID: <4794C4B6.5010309@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:13:42 +0100
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Studio] Should we release a new version of Shared LDAP ?
References: <98d8c0860801210807m73c37430ndd96ce73e4553396@mail.gmail.com>
 <a32f6b020801210811q5f51c4f0iccec3eede79f3414@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a32f6b020801210811q5f51c4f0iccec3eede79f3414@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I'm waiting for the vote. This is just a good example why we need 
separate subprojects. Hopefully, shared-ldap and shared-codec is not 
part of another project ;)

Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Absolutely just kick off the vote. Although this is not a sub-project 
> in itself we can vote on it for release since other projects depend on it.
>
> Studio has just as much a right to push "shared" code releases as does 
> the server.
>
> Alex
>
> On Jan 21, 2008 11:07 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net 
> <mailto:pa@marcelot.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Dev,
>
>     As you know, we're in the middle of a Studio (whether it's a RC or
>     not) and we're trying to fix as many bugs as possible.
>
>     The issue DIRSTUDIO-266 (OpenLDAP schema files parser fails when
>     DESC contains an empty string '') [1] depends on the Apache
>     Directory Shared LDAP project. This project is mainly used by
>     Apache Directory Server but also by Apache Directory Studio.
>
>     As of now, the Studio project has been using this dependency as a
>     SNAPSHOT release, compiling a newest version when a bug was fixed
>     in the trunk of the project, as new releases of the Shared LDAP
>     project only appear when there is a new release of the Apache
>     Directory Server.
>
>     I was wondering if it would make sense to release more often the
>     Shared LDAP project, when either the Server or Studio projects
>     need it for a release.
>
>     WDYT ?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Pierre-Arnaud
>
>     [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-266
>
>


-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L�charny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org