On Jan 2, 2008 2:55 PM, Stefan Seelmann <
seelmann@apache.org
> wrote:
Hi,
in Studio we currently use all kind of naming schema
- sometimes the "I" prefix for interfaces, I choosed it because it is
used in the Eclispe API
- sometimes the Default prefix for implementations
- sometimes the Impl suffix for classed
- ...
I think we should also use a common naming schema and I would suggest to
use the server's naming schema:
> > > (interface) ServerEntry
> > > (abstract class) AbstractServerEntry
> > > (class implementation) DefaultServerEntry
We don't need to rename all interfaces and classes immediately, but if
we refactor one or create a new one we should follow this convention.
WDYT?
Regards,
Stefan
Chris Custine schrieb:
> Just in case you wanted another opinion to reinforce this, I don't like
> IFoo for interface naming either. Hopefully we will never get a
> suggestion to prefix class member variables with m_ xxx either (m_foo).
> These are both pet peeves of mine. :-D
>
> Chris
>
> On Dec 15, 2007 9:53 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com
> <mailto:elecharny@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I think we decided that 'I' stands for Idiot in code ...
>
> PS : I don't maen I'm an Idiot ;)
>
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > Felix,
> >
> > These are all good points which for some reason this morning I could
> > not think about myself. Thanks for showing me again why I don't like
> > this I stuff.
> >
> > Really though I don't like the "I" prefix because it reminds me of Mac
> > and the Mac Store which I hate because of all those moronic
> > metro-sexual sales snobs that think they know something ... :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Dec 15, 2007 11:16 AM, Felix Knecht <felixk@apache.org
> <mailto:
felixk@apache.org>
> > <mailto:felixk@apache.org <mailto:felixk@apache.org>>> wrote:
> >
> > Alex Karasulu schrieb:
> > > Yeap sounds good and like what we discussed.
> > >
> > > On side note though what about the using the 'I' prefix for
> > interfaces?
> > > Like IFoo and IBar etc. I personally don't like it but many
> > projects
> > > seem to use it.
> >
> > I don't like it either
> > - It could also mean Internal, Integration, I... (so you'll need
> > to document it and read documentation anyway)
> > - So it's just one more character (interpretable)
> > - Imaging what happens e.b. when you type I and hit CTRL-Space in
> > Eclipse :-(
> >
> > I'm absolutely fine without 'I'
> >
> > I haven't had a look a the code so maybe it's just a useless note,
> > but IMO it makes (if ever) more sense having
> > interface and implementation split into different modules for api
> > (interfaces) and implementation.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Felix
> >
> > >
> > > Not trying to rehash this but I just want your input again ...
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Dec 15, 2007 9:31 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> <elecharny@gmail.com <mailto:elecharny@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:
elecharny@gmail.com <mailto:elecharny@gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto: elecharny@gmail.com <mailto:
elecharny@gmail.com>
> <mailto: elecharny@gmail.com <mailto:elecharny@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > sorry to rehash the question...
> > >
> > > A while back, we took a decision regarding names for
> interface
> > > implementation. We had several different names all over the
> > code, like
> > > XXXImpl, BasicXXX, DefaultXXX, ConcreteXXX, BaseXXX where
> > XXX is the
> > > interface name. I think we agreed on the "Default" prefix,
> > as far as I
> > > can remember and find on gmail.
> > >
> > > For ServerEntry, this will give :
> > >
> > > (interface) ServerEntry
> > > (abstract class) AbstractServerEntry
> > > (class implementation) DefaultServerEntry
> > >
> > > Is that ok for everybody ?
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > cordialement, regards,
> > > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > >
www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com> <
> http://www.iktek.com> <
http://www.iktek.com>
> > > directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org
>
> <http://directory.apache.org>
> > <http://directory.apache.org
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com>
>
directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org>
>
>
>