directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [ServerEntry] SP modification
Date Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:54:50 GMT
You saying the call to the SP from the client must now use a ServerEntry
object?

Alex

On Jan 18, 2008 9:35 AM, Ersin Er <ersin.er@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm..
>
> This effects the client side. So SPs at the client side need to be
> written SPs with ServerEntry. My intent was using JNDI as much as
> possible but if this is the way we need to go then OK. (Well, we also
> have LdapDN used in SPs.)
>
> On Jan 18, 2008 4:23 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I wanted to emphasis the fact that I have modified the StoredProcedure
> > to use only ServerEntry. This has an impact on the existing SP
> > (BackupUtilitiesSP) :
> >
> > public static void backupDeleted( LdapContext ctx, LdapDN
> deletedEntryName,
> >                                       LdapDN operationPrincipal,
> > ServerEntry deletedEntry )
> >
> > instead of :
> >
> > public static void backupDeleted( LdapContext ctx, LdapDN
> deletedEntryName,
> >                                       LdapDN operationPrincipal,
> > Attributes deletedEntry )
> >
> > If someone has defined some SP using Attributes, he will get some awfull
> > exception.
> >
> > I'm not sure that it's the best solution ever, and that we could not
> > find a better way to go (like implementing some kind of automatic
> > conversion from ServerEntry to Attributes), but at least, it works !
> >
> > This mail is to let you think about the consequences of my modification.
> > I'm waiting for further ideas on the subject, as I don't have the best
> > insight on this piece of code.
> >
> > So, wdyt ?
> >
> > --
> > --
> > cordialement, regards,
> > Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> > www.iktek.com
> > directory.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ersin Er
>

Mime
View raw message