Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.128.184 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=eF/3d5KiUgqmPj+WiSrXZWA5+dMtWtZ0EfyJc4RZYttrrce3FjjZHwFpF1QRjLe0SbGIHxbd9xtZgCSUiErO4vTAK2W4H41eVUvWHR5/0FjUe/CtaLU8qdUJJKSkPuv2x9cpdVbq5vhel1HSJpBG1063uK2NDG4bt4INi5tzjZ4=
Message-ID: <4773E815.3090803@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:59:49 +0100
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Studio] Eclipse 3.3.1 dependencies + "Mavenization" of the trunk
References: <98d8c0860712270952v5f2651d7ld35dd40a1497d5d4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <98d8c0860712270952v5f2651d7ld35dd40a1497d5d4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm happy to tell you that I have successfully generated new launchers 
> (for each platform we support - Mac OS X, Linux and Windows) using 
> Eclipse 3.3.1 dependencies (the latest 3.3.1.1 <http://3.3.1.1> to be 
> precise).
Just great !!!
>
> They can be tested on this branch : 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/branches/studio-eclipse-3.3 
> <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/branches/studio-eclipse-3.3>
>
> I think that moving from the old 3.2 to the latest 3.3.1.1 
> <http://3.3.1.1> Eclipse dependencies could be another great feature 
> for Apache Directory Studio 1.1.0. This update has fixed bugs in the 
> core of Eclipse (and has significantly improved the way widgets are 
> drawn on Mac OS X - at last...).
>
> I was wondering if everybody was OK with releasing Studio 1.1.0 with 
> Eclipse 3.3 dependencies. WDYT ?
+1 for me.
>
>
> I also had a talk with Emmanuel about the "mavenization" of the trunk 
> before releasing Studio 1.1.0.
> Stefan Seelmann and I were more thinking of switching from Ant+Ivy to 
> Maven after the release, but it could also be interesting to delay a 
> little bit the release and use this time to switch our build system. 
> This would help us a lot for future releases, especially if we need to 
> release a 1.1.1 soon after 1.1.0.
>
> Do you think we should "Mavenize" the build before releasing Studio 
> 1.1.0 ?
We are not in a hurry, I think. We can wait a bit to get maven in the 
loop : otherwise, we will have to wait a long time before having maven 
for studio. And also, I think that we need to leverage Felix work, 
because it's ok to work in a sandbox, but at some point, going for real 
is much better :)
>
> Thanks in advance for your wise answers,
> Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot

Thanks for your great work !


-- 
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L�charny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org