From dev-return-22905-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Wed Dec 19 16:49:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63639 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2007 16:49:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2007 16:49:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 34632 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2007 16:49:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 34590 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2007 16:49:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 34579 invoked by uid 99); 19 Dec 2007 16:49:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:49:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.224] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:49:03 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c49so2083422wra.1 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:49:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=kt4ojhd5C5KtFEV84EEm6Bp7meZxADLahuXbdCd+JIo=; b=qojy6AiTRFEKWizD944yokMutPKLBq9D9aZXgwmTIlLdsh6xlIZWT0Tu2+8+mp0zgiMB/OfYJlSzbvladXQoV9NA2oP6pB5abMAcLmQ6bnVml6FEMwdXceQWG0LDLbluiMDcrdfa3jGeixr34WMf5PT7NjazUCcLQWf5EFRhZHc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=wTef4ZXhmoCoAEUMZxSuvzMGHQG/gKPJQHmDX4p3+jcgyyqUiOD2KZVnLKVJG0ZHLpEVhP9VEoLLfLEt/GJTlS4Rz4JUFstZoIsFHdgoOb2IaQUaRQGZbs4Qgbwp2xHfFBK+KNXEFRyf9dWcw5r26XhLvDOYofAqZ6VztM3ii4s= Received: by 10.142.211.10 with SMTP id j10mr2611817wfg.202.1198082944872; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:49:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.166.2 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:49:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:49:04 -0500 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: Technicalities of migration of LDAP mapping component to Apache DS project In-Reply-To: <476916CC.8020701@levigo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_26044_4690893.1198082944844" References: <476916CC.8020701@levigo.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 92d34a031a31a770 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_26044_4690893.1198082944844 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, We need to evaluate the size of the contribution. Jorg can you point us over to the code repository for it? On Dec 19, 2007 8:04 AM, J=F6rg Henne wrote: > Hi all, > > donating the openthinclient.org LDAP mapping component to the Apache DS > project raises the question of how other members of the > openthinclient.org team work on the source code. There are currently two > colleagues of mine working on the code. I see the following solutions: > > - We maintain two completely separate code bases. That doesn't sound > desirable, since they will diverge quickly. > - We maintain the code in the Apache svn. This would require commit > access for the code tree of the mapping component. We can easily accommodate this at some point considering the different mechanisms available for bringing in new subprojects. The Directory PMC ha= s to evaluate how to process this: i.e. does this need incubation or is it small enough to constitute a simple contribution. > > Oh, and by the way: does anyone can think of a catchy name for this > thing? It doesn't have to be creative or clever but only a tad bit less > boring than Object Directory Mapper (ODM?). Currently it doesn't have a > name at all :-) > ODM sounds good. I suck at names but I'll let it sit in my head to see if any ideas come to mind. Alex ------=_Part_26044_4690893.1198082944844 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

We need to evaluate the size of the contribution.  Jorg can= you point us over to the code repository for it? 

On Dec 19, 2007 8:04 AM, J=F6rg Henne < j.henne@levigo.de> wrote:
Hi all,

donating the openthinclient.org LDAP mapping component to the Apache DS
project r= aises the question of how other members of the
openthinclient.org team work on the sour= ce code. There are currently two
colleagues of mine working on the code. I see the following solutions:<= br>
- We maintain two completely separate code bases. That doesn't s= ound
desirable, since they will diverge quickly.
- We maintain the co= de in the Apache svn. This would require commit
access for the code tree of the mapping component.
We can easily accommodate this at some point considering the different mec= hanisms available for bringing in new subprojects.  The Directory PMC = has to evaluate how to process this:=20 i.e. does this need incubation or is it small enough to constitute a simple= contribution.
 

Oh, and by the way: does anyone can think of a catchy name for this
= thing? It doesn't have to be creative or clever but only a tad bit less=
boring than Object Directory Mapper (ODM?). Currently it doesn't ha= ve a
name at all :-)

ODM sounds good.  I suck = at names but I'll let it sit in my head to see if any ideas come to min= d.

Alex
 

------=_Part_26044_4690893.1198082944844--