directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <>
Subject [New Entry API] Name for classes
Date Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:31:07 GMT
Hi guys,

sorry to rehash the question...

A while back, we took a decision regarding names for interface 
implementation. We had several different names all over the code, like 
XXXImpl, BasicXXX, DefaultXXX, ConcreteXXX, BaseXXX where XXX is the 
interface name. I think we agreed on the "Default" prefix, as far as I 
can remember and find on gmail.

For ServerEntry, this will give :

(interface) ServerEntry
(abstract class) AbstractServerEntry
(class implementation) DefaultServerEntry

Is that ok for everybody ?

Thanks !

cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny

View raw message