Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69005 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2007 23:37:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2007 23:37:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 82520 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2007 23:37:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 82478 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2007 23:37:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 82467 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2007 23:37:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:37:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.180] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:37:29 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so1669251waf for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:37:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=F+C63xwjYopjLeeWDDSMGRMOq3TJDpwrz+nl2ttvY2k=; b=KDm9nCE9GS2L9px12jfqUEAdGnIC9jBDJYoIE0gZ8FXrPGsFIQSTwmCV0+FELskEN380NyhX9+RNeL2L9XxFuID6Hl7U8e5MkKfbVgixn+yxEb3NgZetdaSxuVItcg6+aXRk6P2/vvCDG2+Tf5oS/uVrx0ls93IUkhBZFubLYO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=i0Dq2coEnoFqtk0R3mcSjxrBEZJa3HZYzj33XpvxnVZjj3MbSW4xV7lD1M8Ln13tKFpC5WFwnKlv/JzA8tW8lUwldSOXXrp9OiGW+96FiuTFN9OjATgYHqJGO2FKtZg7NbRuGVsotFKuWviIgLBSVyvOB+UCcwKJHxkeEFS4jpM= Received: by 10.114.190.6 with SMTP id n6mr3481625waf.1194133027800; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.18.12 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 16:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 19:37:07 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [Reverse-ldif] Partial Review needed In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_25173_20656060.1194133027789" References: <472CFAEF.10005@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 68a9e6a0c889c81c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_25173_20656060.1194133027789 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Looks good I added some corrections with some info on how we will eventuall= y deal with the operational attributes in this matter. Thanks, Alex On 11/3/07, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > I am looking at it. > > Alex > > On 11/3/07, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm currently working on a reverse-ldif generator, which should produce > > a LDIF file that can be applied to the server in order to return back t= o > > a previous state of the server. > > > > The basic idea, initiated by Alex and Ersin, is to speed up the tests b= y > > > > simply log the modifications, and at the end of the test, apply the > > reverse ldif to restor the base in a previous state. > > > > For that, we must generate what we called reverse-ldif (or anti-ldif) > > for each operation. > > > > I'm almost done for the simplest requests (add, del, modifyDN), I still > > have to analyse the Modify request. Is someone is interested to review > > what I have dumped into the wiki related to these reverse-ldif ? > > > > Here is the page : > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Reverse+LDIF > > > > I may have forgotten some elements, so please feel free to comment and > > tell me if it's OK or not :) > > > > Thanks ! > > > > -- > > -- > > cordialement, regards, > > Emmanuel L=E9charny > > www.iktek.com > > directory.apache.org > > > > > > > ------=_Part_25173_20656060.1194133027789 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Looks good I added some corrections with some info on how we will eventuall= y deal with
the operational attributes in this matter.

Thanks,Alex

On 11/3/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apa= che.org> wrote:
I am looking at it. 

Alex


On 11/3/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <<= a href=3D"mailto:elecharny@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" onclick=3D"return t= op.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys,

I'm currently working on a reverse-ldif generator, whic= h should produce
a LDIF file that can be applied to the server in order = to return back to
a previous state of the server.

The basic idea,= initiated by Alex and Ersin, is to speed up the tests by
simply log the modifications, and at the end of the test, apply the
= reverse ldif to restor the base in a previous state.

For that, we mu= st generate what we called reverse-ldif (or anti-ldif)
for each operatio= n.

I'm almost done for the simplest requests (add, del, modifyDN),= I still
have to analyse the Modify request. Is someone is interested to= review
what I have dumped into the wiki related to these reverse-ldif ?

Here is the page :
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa= y/DIRxSRVx11/Reverse+LDIF

I may have forgotten some elements, so please feel free to comm= ent and
tell me if it's OK or not :)

Thanks !

--
--
cor= dialement, regards,
Emmanuel L=E9charny
www.iktek.com
directory.apac= he.org




------=_Part_25173_20656060.1194133027789--