Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40270 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2007 00:53:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2007 00:53:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 99456 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2007 00:52:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 99407 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2007 00:52:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 99393 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2007 00:52:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:52:50 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of enriquer9@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.176] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:52:53 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so1554076waf for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:52:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ykqowyt97ba4ovbmODgnXGn1C3upmJ2MHwyZYY62ueo=; b=UdQXafx+ZGvP8V1jV3z/RZ/+sKy2jMTMs7fKfsD2Wv1+rlqSTQZEeAvBCsfiHmTHWZ2iHt5NtNVFiqtB/45tq99qtbUvoMqPu9mmdb/f/qvOXQuy0gbCt4OMijILjNcBxdQEKLYUINi0uAkcsFKjKY5n5bw4FuXsVmNKp/RovBA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aW34S+us2NG0RYgTJN3v8gUo1DLp3JGP8fr9nj7VJ4HKUkFRsJpG8Te9BkOzyss0AtscCP7Io/IyYowRZCEHczjqLd3kq+oiFK5nywHlMs7X34KfUZJxepnY2G48L1kG6gGEeL+TJikKF2rY6J3CeSgO6IjzGWKpq5Eaegb+QsQ= Received: by 10.114.199.1 with SMTP id w1mr1405269waf.1194828752740; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.48.8 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:52:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <568753d90711111652y6c1c6c5anc4818702745e6f0e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:52:32 -0800 From: "Enrique Rodriguez" Reply-To: erodriguez@apache.org To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [DNS] Trunk or branch for DNS work? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <568753d90711101905h18dea3dwd9686002de921ebf@mail.gmail.com> <568753d90711101923r26c2d47dmc8235d64da4af87d@mail.gmail.com> <568753d90711111405v3117e83bq3ac7edbf331a545c@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 11, 2007 3:35 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > The dependency is OK in server-unit but not in protocol-dns. If you > want to do over the wire tests do it in server-unit. This is the > point to the module: it's there specifically for over the wire > integration tests. I'm confused because it seems both you and Emm approved the addition of the commons NTP client to the protocol-ntp module, which is used in exactly the same way I was intending to use 'dnsjava', namely with over-the-wire NTP tests. So then, the NTP client and test(s) should be moved to 'server-unit'? In which case we're back to a scalability problem w.r.t. deps in server-unit. Or is it the case that the dep in protocol-ntp is acceptable because NTP doesn't use the backend DIT? Be assured, my intention here has nothing to with creating a "standalone product" but rather the generally-accepted principle of loose-coupling. Enrique