From dev-return-22512-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Wed Nov 14 19:34:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47165 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2007 19:34:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 2007 19:34:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 80125 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 19:33:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 80088 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 19:33:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 80077 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2007 19:33:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:33:50 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of enriquer9@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.177] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:33:40 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so396081waf for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:33:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=60upyPx7hkHv0EKN+2jTspGv5SVIvuDtdqk7mYxsyXo=; b=CRAW416wtrqXgLHLBRTeM2Xlo2diX/Jv68FbIBPC2nFkgVti2sE97qiNNSOPRJs4tHh5piFnSbz3CRfCSDl33hahV0F31pJUt04F1fc2Rm0e3TynuXpms0TGqJmouhnLQXJ44jPCwmjFF7uEFDUm9RPciNnw69dp+bIqQRYS8MA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TWd2NKHY3Ci9Z9awygNAOkS/iKxiKUX5LRj206IQcIQho0lf4pwShqKcCHFpvwt4dapMHnekZE9I1rMa+KlgA/9vw9Nc5VzW2x4PQz29htQvn7dBy108TLX+jPGoCTQHgHXYe8e88U7sllL7lYC9Hg+xy/VidD1kQEpPlmbnoCg= Received: by 10.114.146.1 with SMTP id t1mr224713wad.1195068813585; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:33:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.48.8 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:33:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <568753d90711141133g1bd973dbj5cfcaf0ec67a58c1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:33:33 -0800 From: "Enrique Rodriguez" Reply-To: erodriguez@apache.org To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [DNS] Trunk or branch for DNS work? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <568753d90711101905h18dea3dwd9686002de921ebf@mail.gmail.com> <568753d90711111405v3117e83bq3ac7edbf331a545c@mail.gmail.com> <26545899.31384091194879132924.JavaMail.root@elysia.void.it> <47386CED.7030100@gmail.com> <568753d90711121049h1b3c0ad9j8d3fed97b3cd11b7@mail.gmail.com> <568753d90711131349i43f7ef9eyf5fa01e6fcefb342@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 13, 2007 11:47 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > ... > You are being overly cautious on the wrong front here. If this client > code is just used for tests (with test scope) then the clients will > not be > packaged with the product. > > I don't know if I expressed myself well enough but do you see what I mean? Of course I understand the clients will not be packaged with the product. What I'm trying to avoid is breaking the build by having integration tests using kerberos-client fail, because the kerberos-client is unstable. > ... > bugs if your tests flush them out. You are doing great by adding > tests for existing features. You are not adding new features without > tests, so there is no reason to keep your effort in a sandbox. Tests > are good things which should be given more leeway in the review > process. I agree tests should be given more leeway. Enrique