directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DNS] Trunk or branch for DNS work?
Date Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:51:09 GMT
On Nov 10, 2007 10:23 PM, Enrique Rodriguez <enriquer9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2007 7:16 PM, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> > Yes the bigbang branch is probably best.  Also do you need to have dnsjava dep
> > in the protocol-dns side if the integration tests that test the DNS
> > protocol over the
> > wire are going to be in server-unit?
>
> 'dnsjava' would be used for non-integration tests in 'protocol-dns'.
> I think it makes sense to have both integration tests to make sure the
> backend is fully functional but also to have regular unit tests to
> test finer-grained functionality.  This would also have the benefit of
> making sure protocol workflow is tested during normal builds, ie 'mvn
> install' w/o integration profile.

I agree but dnsjava is a client library.  Are you using it to go
through the wire via
the protocol?

Alex

Mime
View raw message