directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Randy Motluck" <>
Subject Re: Memory only partition?
Date Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:35:44 GMT
Believe it or not, I had actually be working on something quite similar for
an issue I posted.  I have been quite busy and have not put much time
against it.   The problem is that there is quite a bit tied against the
default BTree/Jdbm implementation.

The issue I posted was:

I did not realized your project was quite similar to much of what I stated

I actually spent some time last night on it, but could work a little faster
if needed.  If you wish to take it on, that's fine too.  I was starting w/ a
memory only option so I could use it to derive some kind of "simple" base
classes and caching classes.


On 11/30/07, Alex Karasulu <> wrote:
> Marc,
> On Nov 30, 2007 9:29 AM, Marc Boorshtein <> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Is there a way to run apacheds in a 'memory only' mode?  This would be
> > very useful as a caching mechanism (I plan on integrating ApacheDS as
> > a backend for MyVirtualDirectory).  I'm not a storage expert but if I
> > am pointed int he right direction I'd be happy to take a stab at
> > adding a memory only mode if it doesn't exist.
> >
> We don't have one.  But if you're interested that would be great.  We just
> need a descent in memory BTree implementation to do this quickly.  You might
> be able to use some other combination of data structures too like a
> red-black tree (TreeMap) instead.
> Alex

View raw message