Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60888 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2007 18:52:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2007 18:52:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 83469 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2007 18:52:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 83436 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2007 18:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 83425 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2007 18:52:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:52:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.183] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:52:13 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so1566352waf for ; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:51:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=1j6KB0HSzWQxQ3kc4414UJADt9Au6imfuRA6dcVK+Xk=; b=fFaP2nArClH96sDzr2R4hU8tygFx5Vg4PukhXwEcOGjFvenPNE51mh/uPyKpeC7302SzBYtSd5WTXqWG09DE+oEBuwA4WNtjTe06mLfqUwpcLK5u/6AbG92CvJscEA8dUK5h4crMmmA+E6iGiTlRpj2QhvM6gFYjC5vnMLkQbMM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=PIa8dIITci5qAgjM7awzuJpeC8o0D75cYcFZZtJFlac1g+McHvGa0mEY4MQ17nYDBwXEM9I+0/DhyzbGl/6VYZdmHt3epNSFJNQQyamsDS0n5LvWsLg3wXFG4UgoEZrOv4XtlksMrjlYQhyEiyjLR1yLW3udkJW68jtNc3oAtYg= Received: by 10.114.94.1 with SMTP id r1mr4611629wab.1191783111974; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.76.8 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:51:51 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" , elecharny@iktek.com Subject: Re: [ApacheDS] Sandboxing JBoss Sar (was: Re: [ApacheDS] Running inside JBoss with data storage) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_38694_6962436.1191783111968" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 21dda1199c35579a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_38694_6962436.1191783111968 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 10/7/07, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > there were a convo about sandboxing OSGi back in August (28th) before > we release 1.5.1. Another mail has been sent suggesting to sandbox > sar-plugin too, and I created a JIRA about it. > > May be it was a little bit too fast, for sure. > > We can revert the sandboxing easily. No this was fine I just forgot it. However let's ping the community and see if someone is interested in it and if interested enough to maintain it. I forget who contributed it but that person is long gone. And you are right about such decisions : pushing it as a JIRA just > before a release is not exactly the best way to get the good > visibility, as everyone is just deep into his own tasks to deal with > during the rush hours. > > So consider it as a mistake I did. No worries again I just forgot about it then saw that the sar was gone. It was a bit of a surprise. I think this thread is enough for someone to see and if they really want it we can hear from them and move it back. If not let's leave it where it is. Alex ------=_Part_38694_6962436.1191783111968 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 10/7/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,

there were a convo about sandboxing OSGi back in August (28th) before
we release 1.5.1. Another mail has been sent suggesting to sandbox
sar-plugin too, and I created a JIRA about it.

May be it was a little bit too fast, for sure.

We can revert the sandboxing easily.

No this was fine I just forgot it.  However let's ping the community and see if someone is interested
in it and if interested enough to maintain it.  I forget who contributed it but that person is long gone.

And you are right about such decisions : pushing it as a JIRA just
before a release is not exactly the best way to get the good
visibility, as everyone is just deep into his own tasks to deal with
during the rush hours.

So consider it as a mistake I did.

No worries again I just forgot about it then saw that the sar was gone.  It was a bit of a surprise.
I think this thread is enough for someone to see and if they really want it we can hear from them
and move it back.  If not let's leave it where it is.

Alex

------=_Part_38694_6962436.1191783111968--