Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99796 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2007 22:41:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2007 22:41:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 50174 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2007 22:40:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 50130 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2007 22:40:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 50119 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2007 22:40:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:40:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.249] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:40:58 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so238972ana for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:40:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=+Tgw6OkAcRJriHlqteTLiT9C784WzpWyd6rEey2oEtk=; b=olDBgmgJGKF3+dO3NdU1lFIDkvEjsl+VcVU54JLS92QW3F6bnCrfgVwelDul7otliuWUvMV7tyOFGi3qMZdvIeJacdUZhei2gK2VCeaSeC1X4r7vIwJ+5Oab3uVr+3ub+YKg+2c2WOlNLH+T6L07Qzc6uaxZZo2iakuUXVGR9lI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=um4g3Mzgl46iGDgy3SzYSGhjbYA7O20rpaiZoliyfXysMvcaUej0wyo2pjnDEMHcZ6gwguDYPX620FFEjKoeWiGCf1uSYM4c8UjkA19dsS2v8yWsgz5XZfxVsFQYaH1VR7NsgAJd3xar82mRu0joDC284P4ODexBw5036LyVse0= Received: by 10.142.49.4 with SMTP id w4mr2893339wfw.1192660836704; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.200.6 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98d8c0860710171540m7528bb06k58a563969787341c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:40:36 +0200 From: "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" Sender: pajbam@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: [Studio] Eclipse Rich Ajax Platform (RAP) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2776_29590688.1192660836731" X-Google-Sender-Auth: bf0675213538f4a2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_2776_29590688.1192660836731 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Dev, I've just discovered a new project at the Eclipse Foundation that has graduated from incubation and released its 1.0 release: Eclipse Rich Ajax Platform (RAP): http://www.eclipse.org/rap/ Take a look at the demos provided here: http://www.eclipse.org/rap/demos.php That's very impressive... Eclipse look and feel inside a Web brower... Maybe it could be interesting to take a closer look at that and see if it's not possible to deliver two implementation of UI for our plugins, one with SWT and one with RWT. The core could be the same and we could only rewrite the UI for each platform. Regards, P-A ------=_Part_2776_29590688.1192660836731 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Dev,

I've just discovered a new project at the Eclipse Foundation that has graduated from incubation and released its 1.0 release: Eclipse Rich Ajax Platform (RAP): http://www.eclipse.org/rap/

Take a look at the demos provided here: http://www.eclipse.org/rap/demos.php

That's very impressive... Eclipse look and feel inside a Web brower...

Maybe it could be interesting to take a closer look at that and see if it's not possible to deliver two implementation of UI for our plugins, one with SWT and one with RWT. The core could be the same and we could only rewrite the UI for each platform.

Regards,
P-A

------=_Part_2776_29590688.1192660836731--