directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] [ApacheDS] [BigBang] Should we check point what we have?
Date Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:41:02 GMT
On 10/29/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Well I'm biased but +1 :-)
> There are a couple tiny tweaks I'd like but they are pretty small I think.
>

Likewise I have a few tweaks but I guess we can do some of it before the
copy over.
There may be additional things that are introduced but they would be add on
configuration
items rather than change what exists.  Meaning for additional components
which might
not be present unless used.

Alex

thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Oct 29, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think we can say we're finished with Phase I of the the big bang plan
> [0].
>
> Emmanuel planted the seed in my head that we might consider replacing the
> current trunk with a copy of the big bang branch before moving forward on
> Phase II.  He made some excellent points:
>
>   o this gives developers a chance to see the changes
>   o allows for an interim release if the team wants to release 1.5.2
>   o gives the team a chance to start documenting some changes
>   o prevents stalling somewhat as this refactoring is underway
>
> These are all good points.  Personally I'm strapped on time trying to work
> on
> various things such as Triplesec, the refactoring in bigbang, and my day
> job.
> So I may not have enough time for helping out in a release but I'm fully
> supportive
> of one.
>
> Copying big bang over to trunk check points the refactoring at a community
> level:
> heck svn automatically checkpoints for us and we can tag things as they
> are now
> too.  But the point is it checkpoints the current state and sends a clear
> message
> about where we are and what we can do before we do much with more in the
> bigbang.
> Who knows Phase II might become a big mess and/or we might not like where
> we
> get to.  We may decide to keep things as they are after Phase I.
>
> Should we replace trunk now with the bigbang?
>
> [  ] +1 - replace trunk with big bang in present state
> [  ] +/-0 - don't care
> [  ] -1 - no not now
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> ---------------------
>
> [0] - http://www.nabble.com/-ApacheDS---BigBang--Status-Report-tf4585474.html#a13089517
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message