directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Missing MatchingRule (for ObjectClass, DN, etc ...)
Date Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:32:42 GMT
Sounds good to me.   However let's let this one sit in the head for a while
since it has
potentially wide reaching effects.  It effects the semantics of search and
there are several
things that I cannot easily foresee. So I want to think about this one a
little bit.

Alex

On 10/8/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After investigation, the problem is a little bit more complex than
> what I just described.
>
> We have done some tests with Studio, and here is what we found :
> - if you define an attributeType _without_ any matching rule, then you
> should have a problem. As we cannot use an identity MR (because none
> has been defined), you will get a NPE at some point, unless we define
> the filter as undefined.
> - I have fixed many places in the server where we didn't replaced a
> missing Substring MR by the identity MR. I will commit those fixes
> after integration tests.
> - Now, some users want to do searches using filters like
> (uniqueMember=uid=g.kelly*). Of course, we can say that it should
> return nothing, as the filter is undefined, but I find this a little
> bit too tight. What if we simply use th equality MR in this case ?
>
> I would say that if we don't have Substring MR, we should use Equality
> MR, and if we don't have Equality MR, then we should simply consider
> the filter as undefined. This could be done during the filter parsing,
> instead of doing it during the filter evaluation.
>
> wdyt ?
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
>

Mime
View raw message