directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Bigbrang] Abiut JNDI layer
Date Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:48:21 GMT
No worries.

Alex

On 10/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Forget about my idea, it was just a try. I should have tested it
> before suggesting we can do it.
>
> Sorry for the noise, buddies :)
>
> On 10/5/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> > I think this may be easier to do once we start cleaning up from the
> bigbang.
> >  I
> > have some ideas on how to break up the core a bit to be able to avoid
> these
> > maven module cyclic dependencies.
> >
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >  On 10/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have tried to create this new project, but we have a cycle
> > > dependency problem, so I reverted (locally).
> > >
> > > At the end, I think we should simply start from the ground a new JNDI
> > > layer, and when it's ready, inject it as the interface to the server.
> > > Baby steps again ...
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/5/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Yep that's what I thought we should do.  First the decoupling and
> for
> > some
> > > > time the provider may still reside
> > > > in the core until we swap branches because I don't want to have
> merges
> > cause
> > > > problems with large scale svn folder
> > > > moves.
> > > >
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Ok, so I think we can just create this project, and move the JNDI
> code
> > > > > for it without any problem. It should keep the server working, but
> > > > > will help later.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will give it a try.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Ersin !
> > > > >
> > > > > PS:
> > > >
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxPMGT/JNDI+removing
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/5/07, Ersin Er <ersin.er@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > > As far as I know that's what we intend to do. The server will
> itself
> > be
> > > > > > manageable without the JNDI layer and the JNDI layer will just
> be an
> > > > adaptor
> > > > > > to control the server for those who prefer to interact with
> JNDI.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 10/5/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hu guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to have a
> specific
> > > > > > > apacheds-jndi sub-project, instead of having this jndi
layer
> > inside
> > > > > > > apacheds-core ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wdyt ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Cordialement,
> > > > > > > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > > > > > > www.iktek.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Ersin Er
> > > > > > http://www.ersin-er.name
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Cordialement,
> > > > > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > > > > www.iktek.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Cordialement,
> > > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > > www.iktek.com
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>

Mime
View raw message