Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=cm45OYZ7gIsS/s5CZTIAwlxVi1wfcXSIUb2cMWfkCcEVk7CBNO5GxGdbgIncRAdVn8uGRwwuobBmYBNlIVnzKfXVDYIQIX8LdQ9Wqq0JMgHgC7e82zad2grWjUagNU4r3SbuUVfHsHfOx59MJHBqyDg9QE9+qJ6FRfQQGdSdpBo=
Message-ID: <a32f6b020709241055y170b7fccsaac3131f7b8f01e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:55:22 -0400
From: "Alex Karasulu" <akarasulu@apache.org>
Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Some developer documentation on the delegation of authentication
 feature
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_41602_2314460.1190656522450"

------=_Part_41602_2314460.1190656522450
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi all,

Here's a document I've been preparing for enabling the delegation of
authentication feature.  It's
minimal for now until we flush out some of the ideas but any feedback is
going to be greatly
appreciated.

Overall I am finding that this feature will really be half a solution
without enabling some kind
of virtualization within the server.  And when we do enable virtualization
it will completely impact
the implementation of the feature.  So going back to Ersin's point about
enabling virtual attributes
within the server I am seeing repeated that it's a big must.

Alex

------=_Part_41602_2314460.1190656522450
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi all,<br><br>Here&#39;s a document I&#39;ve been preparing for enabling the delegation of authentication feature.&nbsp; It&#39;s<br>minimal for now until we flush out some of the ideas but any feedback is going to be greatly 
<br>appreciated.&nbsp; <br><br>Overall I am finding that this feature will really be half a solution without enabling some kind <br>of virtualization within the server.&nbsp; And when we do enable virtualization it will completely impact
<br>the implementation of the feature.&nbsp; So going back to Ersin&#39;s point about enabling virtual attributes<br>within the server I am seeing repeated that it&#39;s a big must.<br><br>Alex<br><br>

------=_Part_41602_2314460.1190656522450--