From dev-return-21458-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Thu Sep 20 04:53:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54530 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2007 04:53:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2007 04:53:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 88112 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2007 04:53:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 87899 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2007 04:53:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 87888 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2007 04:53:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:53:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.183] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:53:17 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so550191waf for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:52:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=7LUuN+6MRPchmdieobKv+I3tFbpbKtqYwCIdhnll/Pw=; b=QfVh+Rc6RqKvVk0Ob/v0JBXFsDxunPNNsRNHwvl8ggS3S6GeDgj4ZiPDNzqIdoiEYGLeeeSVlkMcTqzTiPy2mg+fyD+gAqLt7p66YJanCMAYv17xdtlQeI5V1ItLjoT4xmABbK6kXiyFX7RddxV6KSo4xmtnV1xYd21qIFiEcus= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=FOuf1t9I+R7pH/QlWpa1TKF+TJOW4Ns7f+7/SzXsgRWUCTUIIn3ET3dNMezwpPQF5SzopwLgXn/uwLjUWzLYG2+MFumLUeqZaeCXL408kygg6LneRsAIj7WPouyNe6fNghgCxr28QPCU9ojDLhkMQzxlEhd7bo6TLQTGGArvL4A= Received: by 10.115.32.1 with SMTP id k1mr628365waj.1190263977259; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.76.8 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:52:57 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [ApacheDS] Proxied Authorization Control In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_23472_3409005.1190263977254" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6fa9dd6be4a7d21c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_23472_3409005.1190263977254 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Yes absolutely. I was thinking of this request of yours as I was typing this email. We need to implement this capability and it should not be very difficult to do. Alex On 9/19/07, Ersin Er wrote: > > Isn't this related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-676? > > On 9/20/07, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > > > Any takers to work on implementing the Proxied Authorization Control? I > > think this one will be > > easy to implement. We need it for a few reasons: > > > > * Important for IdM > > * Useful when replaying a set of changes from the changelog > > > > Plus I think it's a good way for the admin to poke around and see if > > his/her ACI configuration is working. > > > > Anybody? > > > > Alex > > > > > > -- > Ersin Er > http://www.ersin-er.name ------=_Part_23472_3409005.1190263977254 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Yes absolutely.  I was thinking of this request of yours as I was typing this email.  We need to implement this capability and it should not be very difficult to do.

Alex

On 9/19/07, Ersin Er <ersin.er@gmail.com> wrote:
Isn't this related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-676 ?


On 9/20/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
Any takers to work on implementing the Proxied Authorization Control?  I think this one will be
easy to implement.  We need it for a few reasons:

* Important for IdM
* Useful when replaying a set of changes from the changelog

Plus I think it's a good way for the admin to poke around and see if his/her ACI configuration is working. 

Anybody?

Alex



--
Ersin Er
http://www.ersin-er.name

------=_Part_23472_3409005.1190263977254--