The ant task was used to aggregate all the javadocs instead of having them in
separate modules in the project. Unless we can have the same net effect let's
not change this. If we can get the same consolidated output then let's go ahead
and blow away the ant script.
On Aug 20, 2007, at 2:26 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Well, hmmmm, David,
> I think because we all get burnt with Maven in the last two years, and
> we decided to stop adding plugin to our pom.xml, to avoid breaking the
> build :)
> But this may be the good timing to start adding new plugins to our
> build system :
> - javadoc generation
DIRSERVER-1025. AFAICT the maven-javadoc-plugin generated javadoc is
the same as the antrun generated javadoc was, the aggregation
certainly looks the same to me. The javadoc does end up in a
slightly different place in the generated site, so if there are
external links to it this would have to be fixed.
Please speak up if this causes any problems, it worked fine for me.
> - sources jars generation
I think these are generated by default when you release, or are you
talking about an aggregated source jar for e.g. all of apacheds or
all of shared?
> - checkstyle/PMD/whatever audtit tools
These are useful but would require a sustained effort to reduce
errors they picked up to be useful.
I do think running the findbugs plugin would be very useful, but I
won't suggest it for 1.5.1 :-)
> We just need people like you to handle this task ;)
> On 8/20/07, David Jencks <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Why are we using maven to run ant to generate javadoc rather than
>> using the maven javadoc plugin?
>> david jencks
> Emmanuel Lécharny