Hey thanks MINA folks for chiming in and your support.

-Alex

On 8/14/07, Julien Vermillard <jvermillard@archean.fr > wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:23:49 +0200
"Emmanuel Lecharny" < elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:

> yes, and we will move on this week !
>
> Thanks Julien.
>
> PS : if you are available this week, may I interrupt you if we have
> some problem ?

Yes with pleasure, but it's possible I'm not around. I'm quite busy for
an august month :)

Next week I'm out of office.

Julien

>
> On 8/14/07, Julien Vermillard < jvermillard@archean.fr> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The API impact is minimal, just generics in some places and as Alex
> > said it'll remove the concurrency back-port dependency.
> >
> > If you already depend on Java 1.5 there is no good reason for stick
> > to 1.0.X :)
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:05:34 +0200
> > "Emmanuel Lecharny" < elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Let's try ! It should not be complicated to switch to 1.1.2.
> > >
> > > On 8/14/07, Trustin Lee < trustin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 8/14/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Guys I think we should use MINA 1.1.2 in the trunk which is a
> > > > > jdk 5 port of MINA 1.0 which
> > > > > should remove the extra dependency on the concurrent jar and
> > > > > possibly result in some
> > > > > performance improvements.
> > > > >
> > > > > WDYT?  Trustin could you chime in here with some advice?
> > > >
> > > > It's a good idea! :)
> > > >
> > > > Trustin
> > > > --
> > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > --
> > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > --
> > > > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>