directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Lecharny" <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New project pom for 1.5.1?
Date Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:31:28 GMT
Guys,

if we can have all the dependencies in one single pom, it would be real sweet.

However, I recommand we do that for 1.5.2, and that we don't wait 6
more months before releasing this 1.5.2 !!!

wdyt ?

On 8/22/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> Hmmm good point: I cannot imagine why one project would want a different
> compiler plugin version or a javadoc plugin version.  My problem is once you
> start where do you stop?  All or nothing is what I would prefer so there is
> no ambiguity.
>
> If it was all or nothing what would you choose?
>
> Alex
>
>
> On 8/22/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >
> > Yeah I'm not too keen on this since different projects will be stuck on
> different versions of plugins.
> > I know reuse is a good thing but keeping the main pom light is as well.  I
> don't want any project
> > specificity in this TLP level pom since it weighs down projects that might
> not need those terms
> > in the pom.  Did you look at this?
> >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/DIRxDEV/top-level-pom-management-policy.html
> >
> >
> > yes but it doesn't appear to relate to what I'm suggesting.  Right now
> there are 2 plugin versions specified in the project pom and nothing
> whatever else of any use to a child project.  I think either all the basic
> release management functionality should have its versions specified in the
> project pom or it should be eliminated -- right now it's providing almost no
> value.  Why would we want different subprojects using different compiler or
> javadoc plugin versions?  I'm just thinking of taking the stuff that every
> subproject has to use and putting it in project.
> >
> >
> > In any case this is a really minor issue and if you are happy with things
> as they are I'll revert my changes to project:8-SNAPSHOT
> >
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
> >
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > On 8/20/07, David Jencks < david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > What would people think about moving most of the pluginManagement
> > > into the project/pom.xml and releasing a version 8 for 1.5.1?
> > >
> > > I think it would be even better to get more project info in there but
> > > I'm not sure I'm prepared to do that this week.  I would be able to
> > > move a bunch of pluginManagement.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > david jencks
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny
www.iktek.com

Mime
View raw message