directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: New project pom for 1.5.1?
Date Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:25:00 GMT
Hmmm good point: I cannot imagine why one project would want a different
compiler plugin version or a javadoc plugin version.  My problem is once you
start where do you stop?  All or nothing is what I would prefer so there is
no ambiguity.

If it was all or nothing what would you choose?

Alex

On 8/22/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> Yeah I'm not too keen on this since different projects will be stuck on
> different versions of plugins.
> I know reuse is a good thing but keeping the main pom light is as well.  I
> don't want any project
> specificity in this TLP level pom since it weighs down projects that might
> not need those terms
> in the pom.  Did you look at this?
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/DIRxDEV/top-level-pom-management-policy.html
>
>
> yes but it doesn't appear to relate to what I'm suggesting.  Right now
> there are 2 plugin versions specified in the project pom and nothing
> whatever else of any use to a child project.  I think either all the basic
> release management functionality should have its versions specified in the
> project pom or it should be eliminated -- right now it's providing almost no
> value.  Why would we want different subprojects using different compiler or
> javadoc plugin versions?  I'm just thinking of taking the stuff that every
> subproject has to use and putting it in project.
>
> In any case this is a really minor issue and if you are happy with things
> as they are I'll revert my changes to project:8-SNAPSHOT
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> Alex
>
> On 8/20/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > What would people think about moving most of the pluginManagement
> > into the project/pom.xml and releasing a version 8 for 1.5.1?
> >
> > I think it would be even better to get more project info in there but
> > I'm not sure I'm prepared to do that this week.  I would be able to
> > move a bunch of pluginManagement.
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message