Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81296 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2007 21:15:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2007 21:15:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 88082 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2007 21:15:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 88027 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2007 21:15:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 88016 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2007 21:15:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:15:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.188] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:13:07 -0700 Received: from [84.57.26.143] (helo=[192.168.1.12]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwtQ-1I6Yd31JGI-0003FN; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:12:45 +0200 Message-ID: <468D5ED3.2070904@stefan-seelmann.de> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:12:51 +0200 From: Stefan Seelmann User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache LDAP Studio 0.8.1 ? References: <98d8c0860707050557x796322excd2bcb6381f07950@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <98d8c0860707050557x796322excd2bcb6381f07950@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX192jcgMRyPZAIyEiPBcBtGTrAY8nXAb2osoMi7 TlpdMwl+WdyjGGuPRoDilNQZG0DwRl8UTsdLt74sLibGhckvXu KjpewheNTQLBwnCv1WOTsPlMAKMe5vGzSawKmC1Xdk= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > [X] +1 Release LDAP Studio 0.8.1 Many thanks, P-A for doing all the work and providing the packages. I tested the Linux_i386 and Windows versions, both are working. I don't have a AMD64 machine so I couldn't test the new package. I have some suggestions: 1.) We should keep the os, ws and arch (plus x86_64) tags for the RCP feature in both the feature.xml and the update site because we only provide the RCP application for these platforms. 2.) We should add the version number to the download packages: LDAP_Studio_Linux_AMD64.tar.gz -> LDAP_Studio_0.8.1_Linux_AMD64.tar.gz 3.) I think it is enough if we only release the x86_64 binary package and the update site. I think there are no changes in the other packages. Kind Regards, Stefan Seelmann Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb: > Hi all, > > I've prepared the packages for the 0.8.1 release of Apache LDAP Studio > (the last release under this name). > > As a reminder, this release only fixes the bug on the update site which > makes it unable to download Apache LDAP Studio on a AMD64 machine, as > well as a new dedicated RCP version of Apache LDAP Studio for this > architecture. > > Related Jiras are : > DIRSTUDIO-80 - LDAP Studio does not work on x86_64 > DIRSTUDIO-144 - Unable to install plugins from updatesite on x86_64 > architecture > > The packages are available here : > http://people.apache.org/~pamarcelot/packages > > > Let's vote now: > [ ] +1 Release LDAP Studio 0.8.1 > [ ] +/-0 Abstain > [ ] -1 Do not release LDAP Studio 0.8.1 > > Best regards, > > Pierre-Arnaud