Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35422 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2007 17:21:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2007 17:21:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 91403 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2007 17:21:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 91199 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2007 17:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 91188 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2007 17:21:50 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:21:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ole.ersoy@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.180] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:21:46 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so3020665pyb for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=P/0CHDEE8I6wEs7w4qpksl0nC+gbKbE+8wXpx8rkQ3iVG7Vk0Qg8ZcteULb1cuEahaN5bY3vov/R4z2f4QhGkz7UuTUBhHoO4X36A3qAI2Cf+TvwCnbFPieMTrlwBFKN1g8ETI2s5xoTshNGU1U1yccRMknD5WFTZ/lc5DFBWL0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HrxOu1GeJI0FYdDSFg37LCBOabZlp8QcQfb4JVu2cB80/0IMGLN8ktCeDC5aKYGcCmt5dj2IW2IpKObLeSBYOCMdwfxZVVhwpG767F2ka95o9vgMLyGzA0CLI5jIo++oFw/wdq8lsGeBlmqYL4GsSWQxtm32PAbs5lz9xnl/c3Y= Received: by 10.35.91.10 with SMTP id t10mr7663721pyl.1181496085766; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.6? ( [24.13.179.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f45sm6734289pyh.2007.06.10.10.21.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466C32EE.3090103@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:20:46 -0500 From: Ole Ersoy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: [Improvement] Standardized Test Setups for Projects Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Guys, Should we have standardized test setups for projects? This way, when creating a test and submitting it via JIRA, the test only contains the "Test", and uses the setup and from the pre-created Setup class. For instance the self contained test I just submitted had all the connection and hot partitioning dependencies etc. If there was a pre-created test projected for this, I would just check it out, update, and check back in. Those without access to subversion, could just check out, create the test, attach to JIRA, and check back in... Cheers, - Ole