Go for it Chris! I trust you have a better grasp of this than I do. Thanks, Alex On 6/21/07, Chris Custine wrote: > > While I was looking into the server-main logging issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-979 > ), I came to the conclusion that our logging config in the poms needs some > cleanup so I want to make the following proposal. > > 1). Add slf4j default dependencies to parent pom.xml for each project such > as daemon, shared, apacheds). There is a lot of duplication of logging > setup in every subproject, so this would configure the default as slf4j-api > for compile scope and either slf4j-simple or slf4j-nlog4j for test scope > (requires concrete slf4j impl for JUnit tests). This would mean that normal > subprojects don't need additional dependencies in their pom and will use the > default which works for almost all 35-40 subprojects except those that > require actual runtime packaging. For the remaining projects that require > runtime dependencies such as server-installers, server-main, and the > plugins, we just add a concrete slf4j implementation like nlog4j to the > subproject pom and it will package up all the dependencies. This config > will also help fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-979 and > it limits transitive dependencies in our maven artifacts so that users can > use their own impls. > > 2). Replace commons-logging with jcl104-over-slf4j which is a clone of > commons-logging that will just defer to slf4j. Commons-logging is required > at runtime by spring and possibly some other dependencies but it has some > peculiar problems that aren't obvious. If anyone wants more info on this I > can go on for days about it... > > I was also thinking we could provide maven profiles for specifying the > inclusion of different log impls in server-main since this has come up a few > times. The installers will package nlog4j as a default, and the user can > change them out if required. > > I would also like to go ahead and update the apacheds, shared, and daemon > parent poms to *-parent since it also requires modifying all of the poms in > each subproject ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-977) as > long as no one objects. I have all of these changes running locally and > have tested them out quite a bit today. > > Sorry this is a little lengthy. Does anyone have any opinions or ideas? > > Chris >