directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Lecharny" <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Sandboxing undocumented protocols (was: Re: [Vote] Sandboxing DHCP protocol)
Date Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:22:21 GMT
I think that we might also use NTP for Mitosis.

So keeping it, as it is already documented (the configuration has been
completed by Christine), should be ok

On 6/7/07, Stefan Zoerner <stefan@labeo.de> wrote:
>
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > Just changed the name so we can discuss the other services separately
> from
> > the vote thread.
> >
> > Note that I think we might want to leave NTP since it is complete from
> my
> > understanding but Enrique would know best.  Also NTP might be needed for
> > time synch for Kerberos which needs time synchronization to
> function.  DNS
> > is not needed but is somewhat complete?
>
> NTP is quite simple, so it should be quite easy to provide user
> documentation. There is already something available
>
> http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/ntp-protocol-provider.html
>
> I volunteer for a simple "Getting started" article about how to enable
> the protocol in the configuration and check with a client -- step by step.
>
> Greetings,
>      Stefan
>
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny
www.iktek.com

Mime
View raw message