directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Sandboxing undocumented protocols (was: Re: [Vote] Sandboxing DHCP protocol)
Date Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:25:18 GMT
On 6/7/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think that we might also use NTP for Mitosis.


Ahhhh yes yes we might need it there if we do not use timing offsets in the
change sequence number vector.

So keeping it, as it is already documented (the configuration has been
> completed by Christine), should be ok
>
> On 6/7/07, Stefan Zoerner <stefan@labeo.de> wrote:
> >
> > Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > > Just changed the name so we can discuss the other services separately
> > from
> > > the vote thread.
> > >
> > > Note that I think we might want to leave NTP since it is complete from
> > my
> > > understanding but Enrique would know best.  Also NTP might be needed
> > for
> > > time synch for Kerberos which needs time synchronization to
> > function.  DNS
> > > is not needed but is somewhat complete?
> >
> > NTP is quite simple, so it should be quite easy to provide user
> > documentation. There is already something available
> >
> > http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/ntp-protocol-provider.html
> >
> > I volunteer for a simple "Getting started" article about how to enable
> > the protocol in the configuration and check with a client -- step by
> > step.
> >
> > Greetings,
> >      Stefan
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com

Mime
View raw message