directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 1.5.1 release soon ?
Date Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:30:32 GMT
sure let's do it

On 6/7/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ho, np at all...
>
> I was not thinking about releasing 1.5.1 in the next few hours ;)
>
>
> On 6/7/07, Ersin Er < ersin.er@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As we want to release more frequently, let's do it. But let's give it
> > one week so some small issues can be fixed like documentation.
> >
> > On 6/7/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi dear developpers !
> > >
> > > we have had recently some huge modifications in the server, and I'm
> > just
> > > wondering if it won't be good for us and mainly for our users to
> > release a
> > > new version, 1.5.1, to get some feedback from our users (release often
> > > strategy) ?
> > >
> > > * SASL has been added, and it was an expected addition to the server.
> > As it
> > > is a huge modification, it seems to be quite reasonnable to push it
> > into a
> > > revision, and move on to a new version (namely, 1.5.2-SNAPSHOT ).
> > > * We can also use MD5 and SHA (salted or not) for passwords
> > > * Peformances have been improved for searches requests ( topping 4500
> > req/s
> > > on my laptop)
> > >
> > >
> > > Releasing 1.5.1 means serious impacts, though :
> > >  - we still have some problem with the current configuration, as it
> > has been
> > > changed a lot for SASL. We would have expected those changes to be
> > pushed to
> > > the next version, but, well, it's done. I suggest that we keep the
> > current
> > > configuration, but we wil have to address some of the issues it
> > generates.
> > > - that also means the the documentation about configuration must be
> > reviewed
> > > - the Configuration plugin has to be modified. pam estimation is that
> > it
> > > will take him 3 or 4 days to do it
> > > - we still have to change some logic in the BindRequest code, because
> > I'm
> > > afraid that performance won't be very good
> > > - we have a hell lot of bugs in 1.5.1 (16, including 2 blockers), but
> > we may
> > > want to fix some of them only, like referrals or uniqueMember, and
> > push the
> > > other ones to 1.5.2
> > >
> > > wdyt ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Cordialement,
> > > Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> > > www.iktek.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ersin Er
> >
> > R.A. and Ph.D Student at the Dept. of Computer Eng. in Hacettepe
> > University
> > http://www.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr
> >
> > Committer and PMC Member of The Apache Directory Project
> > http://directory.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
>

Mime
View raw message