directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: OT kerberos, iwa and proxys
Date Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT
SPNEGO does this.

Alex

On 6/1/07, Marc Boorshtein <mboorshtein@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks
>
> What I'm actually doing is trying to proxy the ticket as part of an
> http request/response but I thought I had heard that kerberos tickets
> could not be proxied unchanged.  It sounds like that's not the case.
> Ill read those links.
>
> Thanks!
> Marc
>
> On 6/1/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org> wrote:
> > Marc Boorshtein a écrit :
> >
> > > All,
> >
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > >
> > > I've got an kerberos question when cobined with integrated windows
> > > authentication.  Can the process of authenticating the user to an iis
> > > server be proxied succesfully?
> >
> > so far, I think you just need to enable SPNEGO on you browser to do so
> > (
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v6r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.websphere.base.doc/info/aes/ae/tsec_SPNEGO_config_web.html
> > <
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v6r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.websphere.base.doc/info/aes/ae/tsec_SPNEGO_config_web.html
> >)
> >
> > Of couse, this will be helpfull if you are just using a browser...
> > Otherwise, your application will have to implement SPNEGO. FYI, we have
> > written a java codec for this protocol, but it has been sandboxed...
> > Just tell us if you want it to be ressucitated.
> >
> >
> > Emmanuel.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for any input.
> > >
> > > Marc
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/1/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 6/1/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> SNIP
> > >>
> > >> BasicAttributes to a more ldap compliant BasicAttributesImpl...)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> What about renaming  BasicAttributesImpl to just LdapAttributes?  Of
> > >> course
> > >> not in the 1.0 branch which would break backwards compatibility of
> > >> partitions but in the 1.5 branch?  Guess really it's the 0.9.6 branch
> of
> > >> shared for 1.5 of ApacheDS.
> > >>
> > >> Anyway this would be clearer no?
> > >>
> > >> Alex
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message