Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31918 invoked from network); 28 May 2007 15:12:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 May 2007 15:12:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 46296 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2007 15:12:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 46255 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2007 15:12:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 46244 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2007 15:12:22 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 08:12:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.245 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.245] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 08:12:17 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c31so409077ana for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 08:11:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Kk9/3xeH5Z5D8voDG4F/K5cb8Go3U34lYRBBNBBaXOVLD+0vL773v7mbHZStGQ3OlHZUAyxScyJ2B7RDfaMw+BFo+y72ezH3WvYFQTLIZMFolYadF1OqCb5sUR1ymugLHrF3N8Z28bvNfixAgja7GwDC7L1Q6qURYIq8YBfv5+E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=JPninFBQc63wk0ZVbuE0kB64V7wc9DnoX3RJ8SyeuKToFEPl+p2Lcz8V3CZIBr75Lnrm0j+FgHjk/mkFj6TdrXWk8VH0JE1zx67NbQMsjGy2znyvaSL/duoO33nidTw29TeMlQ8ozW91a3E2uNzx8jnr8q1Xvpzmj07tX++SFfM= Received: by 10.143.29.17 with SMTP id g17mr169209wfj.1180365111858; Mon, 28 May 2007 08:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.77.21 with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 08:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 11:11:51 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Policy for Managing TLP POM In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_28053_19800971.1180365111797" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: c961e1cb99bccfab X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_28053_19800971.1180365111797 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1 Alex On 5/22/07, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > Hi all, > > I compiled some documentation talking about how we should handle a parent > POM for our TLP > so all subprojects can inherit from it. We have been using it incorrectly > and have been loosing > track of it. I explain all this and expose some simple policy (6 rules) > that will help us keep this > all straight [1]. > > Please read this and let's vote on it make it official. > > [ ] +1 Apply this policy/process for TLP POM management > [ ] +/-0 Abstain - don't understand or don't care > [ ] -1 Do *NOT* apply this policy for TLP POM management > > -- Alex > > ------- > [1] - http://cwiki.apache.org/DIRxDEV/top-level-pom-management-policy.html > > > > ------=_Part_28053_19800971.1180365111797 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1
Alex

On 5/22/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
Hi all,

I compiled some documentation talking about how we should handle a parent POM for our TLP
so all subprojects can inherit from it.  We have been using it incorrectly and have been loosing
track of it. I explain all this and expose some simple policy (6 rules) that will help us keep this
all straight [1]. 

Please read this and let's vote on it make it official.

[  ] +1 Apply this policy/process for TLP POM management
[  ] +/-0 Abstain - don't understand or don't care
[  ] -1 Do *NOT* apply this policy for TLP POM management

-- Alex

-------
[1] - http://cwiki.apache.org/DIRxDEV/top-level-pom-management-policy.html



------=_Part_28053_19800971.1180365111797--